These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


103 related items for PubMed ID: 20653654

  • 1. 'Insignificant' prostate cancer on prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy: variation on a theme 'low-volume/low-grade' prostate cancer?
    Trpkov K, Yilmaz A, Bismar TA, Montironi R.
    BJU Int; 2010 Aug; 106(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 20653654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The volume of prostate cancer in the biopsy specimen cannot reliably predict the quantity of cancer in the radical prostatectomy specimen on an individual basis.
    Cupp MR, Bostwick DG, Myers RP, Oesterling JE.
    J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1543-8. PubMed ID: 7714976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
    Noguchi M, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Yemoto CM.
    J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Prediction of potentially insignificant prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy for clinically organ-confined disease.
    Miyake H, Sakai I, Harada K, Hara I, Eto H.
    Int J Urol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 15828954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Prostate biopsy: who, how and when. An update.
    Djavan B, Milani S, Remzi M.
    Can J Urol; 2005 Feb; 12 Suppl 1():44-8; discussion 99-100. PubMed ID: 15780165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Micro-focal prostate cancer: a comparison of biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen features.
    Boccon-Gibod LM, Dumonceau O, Toublanc M, Ravery V, Boccon-Gibod LA.
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):895-9. PubMed ID: 16125298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluation of the prostate peripheral zone/capsule in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy: defining risk with prostate capsule sparing cystectomy.
    Weizer AZ, Shah RB, Lee CT, Gilbert SM, Daignault S, Montie JE, Wood DP.
    Urol Oncol; 2007 Dec; 25(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18047952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The percent of cores positive for cancer in prostate needle biopsy specimens is strongly predictive of tumor stage and volume at radical prostatectomy.
    Sebo TJ, Bock BJ, Cheville JC, Lohse C, Wollan P, Zincke H.
    J Urol; 2000 Jan; 163(1):174-8. PubMed ID: 10604340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
    Moussa AS, Li J, Soriano M, Klein EA, Dong F, Jones JS.
    BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Radical prostatectomy for clinically advanced (cT3) prostate cancer since the advent of prostate-specific antigen testing: 15-year outcome.
    Ward JF, Slezak JM, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Zincke H.
    BJU Int; 2005 Apr; 95(6):751-6. PubMed ID: 15794776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Improved clinical staging system combining biopsy laterality and TNM stage for men with T1c and T2 prostate cancer: results from the SEARCH database.
    Freedland SJ, Presti JC, Terris MK, Kane CJ, Aronson WJ, Dorey F, Amling CL, SEARCH Database Study Group.
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2129-35. PubMed ID: 12771734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Is incidentally detected prostate cancer in patients undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy clinically significant?
    Mazzucchelli R, Barbisan F, Scarpelli M, Lopez-Beltran A, van der Kwast TH, Cheng L, Montironi R.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Feb; 131(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 19141388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prevalence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostate gland of Korean men: comparisons between radical prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy.
    Han KS, Jeong IG, Joung JY, Yang SO, Chung J, Seo HK, Park WS, Lee KH.
    Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1100-3. PubMed ID: 18158026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of incidentally detected prostate cancer with screen-detected prostate cancer treated by prostatectomy.
    Wolters T, Montironi R, Mazzucchelli R, Scarpelli M, Roobol MJ, van den Bergh RC, van Leeuwen PJ, Hoedemaeker RF, van Leenders GJ, Schröder FH, van der Kwast TH.
    Prostate; 2012 Jan; 72(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 21538424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinicopathological features of prostate cancers detected after an initial diagnosis of 'atypical glands suspicious for cancer'.
    Zhou M, Magi-Galluzzi C.
    Pathology; 2010 Jun; 42(4):334-8. PubMed ID: 20438405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.