These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

300 related items for PubMed ID: 20655782

  • 1. Assessment of computerized treatment planning system accuracy in calculating wedge factors of physical wedged fields for 6 MV photon beams.
    Muhammad W, Maqbool M, Shahid M, Hussain A, Tahir S, Matiullah, Rooh G, Ahmad T, Lee SH.
    Phys Med; 2011 Jul; 27(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 20655782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V, Barsoum P, Westermark M, Brualla L, Lax I.
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A Monte Carlo study on internal wedges using BEAM.
    van der Zee W, Welleweerd J.
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 12033584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Measurements of primary off-axis ratios in wedged asymmetric photon fields: a formalism for dose and monitor unit calculations.
    Mihailidis DN, Tomara PD, Gibbons JP.
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May 07; 50(9):2003-14. PubMed ID: 15843733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [The estimation of the absorbed dose with wedge fields].
    Ferri A, Ruggeri R.
    Radiol Med; 1997 Oct 07; 94(4):385-7. PubMed ID: 9465247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Calculating dose and output factors for wedged photon radiotherapy fields using a convolution/superposition method.
    Liu HH, Mackie TR, McCullough EC.
    Med Phys; 1997 Nov 07; 24(11):1714-28. PubMed ID: 9394279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
    Ahmad M, Deng J, Lund MW, Chen Z, Kimmett J, Moran MS, Nath R.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan 21; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Measurements of basic parameters in wedged high-energy photon beams using a mini-phantom.
    Georg D, Garibaldi C, Dutreix A.
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Sep 21; 42(9):1821-31. PubMed ID: 9308086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Dosimetric Characteristics of 6 MV Modified Beams by Physical Wedges of a Siemens Linear Accelerator.
    Zabihzadeh M, Birgani MJ, Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi M, Arvandi S, Hoseini SM, Fadaei M.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016 Sep 21; 17(4):1685-9. PubMed ID: 27221838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of pencil beam and collapsed cone algorithms, in radiotherapy treatment planning for 6 and 10 MV photon.
    Buzdar SA, Afzal M, Todd-Pokropek A.
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2010 Sep 21; 22(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 22338443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
    Van Esch A, Tillikainen L, Pyykkonen J, Tenhunen M, Helminen H, Siljamäki S, Alakuijala J, Paiusco M, Lori M, Huyskens DP.
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov 21; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Dosimetry of large wedged high-energy photon beams.
    Podgorsak MB, Kubsad SS, Paliwal BR.
    Med Phys; 1993 Nov 21; 20(2 Pt 1):369-73. PubMed ID: 8497224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Commissioning stereotactic radiosurgery beams using both experimental and theoretical methods.
    Ding GX, Duggan DM, Coffey CW.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May 21; 51(10):2549-66. PubMed ID: 16675869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Modelling lateral beam quality variations in pencil kernel based photon dose calculations.
    Nyholm T, Olofsson J, Ahnesjö A, Karlsson M.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug 21; 51(16):4111-8. PubMed ID: 16885628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dosimetry and clinical implementation of dynamic wedge.
    Klein EE, Low DA, Meigooni AS, Purdy JA.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Feb 01; 31(3):583-92. PubMed ID: 7852124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Dosimetric validation of the anisotropic analytical algorithm for photon dose calculation: fundamental characterization in water.
    Fogliata A, Nicolini G, Vanetti E, Clivio A, Cozzi L.
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar 21; 51(6):1421-38. PubMed ID: 16510953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams.
    Künzler T, Fotina I, Stock M, Georg D.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec 21; 54(24):7363-77. PubMed ID: 19934489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A 4 MV flattening filter-free beam: commissioning and application to conformal therapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy.
    Stevens SW, Rosser KE, Bedford JL.
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul 07; 56(13):3809-24. PubMed ID: 21628779
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Calculating dose distributions and wedge factors for photon treatment fields with dynamic wedges based on a convolution/superposition method.
    Liu HH, McCullough EC, Mackie TR.
    Med Phys; 1998 Jan 07; 25(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 9472826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Beam-hardening effects of wedges on a spoiled 6 MV beam.
    Lee PC, Glasgow GP.
    Med Dosim; 1994 Jan 07; 19(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 7818752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.