These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

378 related items for PubMed ID: 20657877

  • 1. Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts 3 years after loading: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Merli M, Lombardini F, Esposito M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):801-7. PubMed ID: 20657877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Vertical ridge augmentation with autogenous bone grafts: resorbable barriers supported by ostheosynthesis plates versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A preliminary report of a blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Merli M, Migani M, Esposito M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 17622003
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogeneic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium-reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: a prospective pilot study.
    Fontana F, Santoro F, Maiorana C, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Simion M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1003-12. PubMed ID: 19216268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Vertical bone augmentation with dental implant placement: efficacy and complications associated with 2 different techniques. A retrospective cohort study.
    Merli M, Migani M, Bernardelli F, Esposito M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):600-6. PubMed ID: 16955612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A randomized-controlled clinical trial evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes after 3 and 5 years of dental implants placed in bone regenerated by means of GBR techniques with or without the addition of BMP-2.
    Jung RE, Windisch SI, Eggenschwiler AM, Thoma DS, Weber FE, Hämmerle CH.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):660-6. PubMed ID: 19489935
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio Oss).
    Simion M, Fontana F, Rasperini G, Maiorana C.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):620-9. PubMed ID: 17877463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Bone level variation after vertical ridge augmentation: resorbable barriers versus titanium-reinforced barriers. A 6-year double-blind randomized clinical trial.
    Merli M, Moscatelli M, Mariotti G, Rotundo R, Bernardelli F, Nieri M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014 Oct; 29(4):905-13. PubMed ID: 25032771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A 3-year post-loading report of a randomised controlled trial on the rehabilitation of posterior atrophic mandibles: short implants or longer implants in vertically augmented bone?
    Esposito M, Cannizarro G, Soardi E, Pellegrino G, Pistilli R, Felice P.
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011 Oct; 4(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 22282728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Immediate nonocclusal versus early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: 1-year results from a multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Testori T, Galli F, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Esposito M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Oct; 22(5):815-22. PubMed ID: 17974118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
    Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Oct; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 5 x 5 mm implants with a novel nanostructured calcium-incorporated titanium surface or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year results from a randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R, Felice P, Piattelli M, Gessaroli M, Soardi E, Barausse C, Buti J, Corvino V.
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013 Oct; 6(4):343-57. PubMed ID: 24570980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Sinus grafting with a natural fluorohydroxyapatite for immediate load: a study with histologic analysis and histomorphometry.
    Lee CY, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS, Stover JD, Suzuki JB.
    J Oral Implantol; 2009 Oct; 35(4):164-75. PubMed ID: 19813420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Short implants versus longer implants in vertically augmented posterior mandibles: a randomised controlled trial with 5-year after loading follow-up.
    Felice P, Cannizzaro G, Barausse C, Pistilli R, Esposito M.
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2014 Oct; 7(4):359-69. PubMed ID: 25422824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation: a novel approach using osteosynthesis microplates, bone grafts, and resorbable barriers.
    Merli M, Bernardelli F, Esposito M.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Dec; 26(6):581-7. PubMed ID: 17243331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm long 4 mm wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. One-year post-loading results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Pistilli R, Felice P, Cannizzaro G, Piatelli M, Corvino V, Barausse C, Buti J, Soardi E, Esposito M.
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013 Dec; 6(4):359-72. PubMed ID: 24570981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional block grafts: bone from the iliac crest versus bovine anorganic bone.
    Felice P, Marchetti C, Piattelli A, Pellegrino G, Checchi V, Worthington H, Esposito M.
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2008 Dec; 1(3):183-98. PubMed ID: 20467621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
    Bystedt H, Rasmusson L.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional bloc grafts: bone from the iliac crest vs. bovine anorganic bone. Clinical and histological results up to one year after loading from a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
    Felice P, Marchetti C, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Worthington H, Pellegrino G, Esposito M.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1386-93. PubMed ID: 19681966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 2-4-year prospective study on humans.
    Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):432-40. PubMed ID: 17501979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.