These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
460 related items for PubMed ID: 20672994
1. Short communication: Comparable safety and efficacy with once-daily versus twice-daily dosing of lopinavir/ritonavir tablets with emtricitabine + tenofovir DF in antiretroviral-naïve, HIV type 1-infected subjects: 96 week final results of the randomized trial M05-730. González-García J, Cohen D, Johnson M, Sloan L, Fredrick L, Naylor C, da Silva B, Bernstein B, M05-730 Study Group. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses; 2010 Aug; 26(8):841-5. PubMed ID: 20672994 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A lopinavir/ritonavir-based once-daily regimen results in better compliance and is non-inferior to a twice-daily regimen through 96 weeks. Molina JM, Podsadecki TJ, Johnson MA, Wilkin A, Domingo P, Myers R, Hairrell JM, Rode RA, King MS, Hanna GJ. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses; 2007 Dec; 23(12):1505-14. PubMed ID: 18160008 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Examination of noninferiority, safety, and tolerability of lopinavir/ritonavir and raltegravir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir and tenofovir/ emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naïve subjects: the progress study, 48-week results. Reynes J, Lawal A, Pulido F, Soto-Malave R, Gathe J, Tian M, Fredrick LM, Podsadecki TJ, Nilius AM. HIV Clin Trials; 2011 Dec; 12(5):255-67. PubMed ID: 22180523 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir versus lopinavir/ritonavir in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected patients at week 48. Ortiz R, Dejesus E, Khanlou H, Voronin E, van Lunzen J, Andrade-Villanueva J, Fourie J, De Meyer S, De Pauw M, Lefebvre E, Vangeneugden T, Spinosa-Guzman S. AIDS; 2008 Jul 31; 22(12):1389-97. PubMed ID: 18614861 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-matched, multicenter trial of abacavir/lamivudine or tenofovir/emtricitabine with lopinavir/ritonavir for initial HIV treatment. Smith KY, Patel P, Fine D, Bellos N, Sloan L, Lackey P, Kumar PN, Sutherland-Phillips DH, Vavro C, Yau L, Wannamaker P, Shaefer MS, HEAT Study Team. AIDS; 2009 Jul 31; 23(12):1547-56. PubMed ID: 19542866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir compared with twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir, each in combination with tenofovir and emtricitabine, for management of antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients: 96-week efficacy and safety results of the CASTLE study. Molina JM, Andrade-Villanueva J, Echevarria J, Chetchotisakd P, Corral J, David N, Moyle G, Mancini M, Percival L, Yang R, Wirtz V, Lataillade M, Absalon J, McGrath D, CASTLE Study Team. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2010 Mar 31; 53(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 20032785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Final 192-week efficacy and safety of once-daily darunavir/ritonavir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve patients in the ARTEMIS trial. Orkin C, DeJesus E, Khanlou H, Stoehr A, Supparatpinyo K, Lathouwers E, Lefebvre E, Opsomer M, Van de Casteele T, Tomaka F. HIV Med; 2013 Jan 15; 14(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 23088336 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and adherence in HIV-1-infected, antiretroviral-naïve patients treated with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus fixed-dose tenofovir DF/emtricitabine given once daily. Elion R, Cohen C, Ward D, Ruane P, Ortiz R, Reddy YS, Ebrahimi R, McColl D, Kearney B, Fisher A, Flaherty J, BATON Study Group. HIV Clin Trials; 2008 Jan 15; 9(4):213-24. PubMed ID: 18753116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. 96-week comparison of once-daily atazanavir/ritonavir and twice-daily lopinavir/ritonavir in patients with multiple virologic failures. Johnson M, Grinsztejn B, Rodriguez C, Coco J, DeJesus E, Lazzarin A, Lichtenstein K, Wirtz V, Rightmire A, Odeshoo L, McLaren C. AIDS; 2006 Mar 21; 20(5):711-8. PubMed ID: 16514301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen provides noninferior antiviral activity compared with a twice-daily regimen. Johnson MA, Gathe JC, Podzamczer D, Molina JM, Naylor CT, Chiu YL, King MS, Podsadecki TJ, Hanna GJ, Brun SC. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2006 Oct 01; 43(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 16951643 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The CASTLE study: atazanavir/r versus lopinavir/r in antiretroviral-naive patients. Chetchotisakd P. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther; 2009 Sep 01; 7(7):801-5. PubMed ID: 19735222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of once-daily versus twice-daily combination antiretroviral therapy in treatment-naive patients: results of AIDS clinical trials group (ACTG) A5073, a 48-week randomized controlled trial. Flexner C, Tierney C, Gross R, Andrade A, Lalama C, Eshleman SH, Aberg J, Sanne I, Parsons T, Kashuba A, Rosenkranz SL, Kmack A, Ferguson E, Dehlinger M, Mildvan D, ACTG A5073 Study Team. Clin Infect Dis; 2010 Apr 01; 50(7):1041-52. PubMed ID: 20192725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost effectiveness of atazanavir-ritonavir versus lopinavir-ritonavir in treatment-naïve human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients in the United States. Broder MS, Chang EY, Bentley TG, Juday T, Uy J. J Med Econ; 2011 Apr 01; 14(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 21288058 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]