These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 20677022

  • 1. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q, Du J, Liu X, Shao L.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of the effects of acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation on non-reactive non-stress test: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hasanpour S, Raouf S, Shamsalizadeh N, Bani S, Ghojazadeh M, Sheikhan F.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 23329342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of the manual stimulation test and the nonstress test: a randomized controlled trial.
    Piyamongkol W, Trungtawatchai S, Chanprapaph P, Tongsong T.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2006 Dec; 89(12):1999-2002. PubMed ID: 17214048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the acoustic stimulation test with nonstress test. A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Tongsong T, Piyamongkol W.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 8169910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Clinical evaluation of antepartum vibratory acoustic stimulation test].
    Chen BJ.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Mar; 26(2):71-4, 123. PubMed ID: 1860368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
    Smith CV, Phelan JP, Broussard P, Paul RH.
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Factors that increase reactivity during fetal nonstress testing.
    Esin S.
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 26(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 24614020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health.
    Arulkumaran S, Anandakumar C, Wong YC, Ratnam SS.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2911425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fetal vibro-acoustic stimulation with a can--a clinical study.
    Hofmeyr GJ, Lawrie TA, de Jager M, da Ponte A.
    S Afr Med J; 1998 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):199-200, 203. PubMed ID: 9542487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of the auscultated acceleration test and the nonstress test as predictors of perinatal outcomes.
    Paine LL, Benedict MI, Strobino DM, Gegor CL, Larson EL.
    Nurs Res; 1992 Feb; 41(2):87-91. PubMed ID: 1549525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y, Kittipibul V.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 11460963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Non-reactive pattern diagnosed by ultrasonic Doppler fetal actocardiogram and outcome of the fetuses with non-reactive pattern].
    Teshima N.
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 May; 45(5):423-30. PubMed ID: 8496632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Value of long-distance fetal heart rate monitoring on the pre-partum health care of the pregnant woman with umbilical cord loops].
    Pan J, Lu Y, Pan L, Li H, Ye M, Shen L, Li Y, Du X, Han S.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 37(8):451-4. PubMed ID: 12411021
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
    Smith CV, Phelan JP, Nguyen HN, Jacobs N, Paul RH.
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Evaluation of fetal well-being by vibro-acoustic stimulation test].
    Sun DW, Chen XX, Gai MY.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Jun; 29(6):322-4, 380. PubMed ID: 8001402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Diagnostic evaluation of fetal distress during pregnancy by a sound stimulation test].
    Querleu D, Boutteville C, Renard X, Crépin G.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1984 Jun; 13(7):789-96. PubMed ID: 6526980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing.
    Chutiwongse S, Tannirandorn Y, Sukcharoen N, Witoonpanich P, Snidvongs W, Phaosavasdi S.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring.
    Batcha TM, Goonewardene IM.
    Ceylon Med J; 2005 Dec; 50(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 16538910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fetal acoustic stimulation for rapid intrapartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y, Wacharaprechanont T, Phaosavasdi S.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1993 Nov; 76(11):606-12. PubMed ID: 7964235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The predictive value of fetal acoustic stimulation.
    Saraçoğlu F, Göl K, Sahin I, Türkkani B, Oztopçu C.
    J Perinatol; 1999 Mar; 19(2):103-5. PubMed ID: 10642968
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.