These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

243 related items for PubMed ID: 20689024

  • 21. Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.
    Leibold LJ, Yarnell Bonino A, Buss E.
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 26783855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE, Wang LM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr 15; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Informational Masking Effects on Neural Encoding of Stimulus Onset and Acoustic Change.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2019 Apr 15; 40(1):156-167. PubMed ID: 29782442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Bidirectional clear speech perception benefit for native and high-proficiency non-native talkers and listeners: intelligibility and accentedness.
    Smiljanić R, Bradlow AR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec 15; 130(6):4020-31. PubMed ID: 22225056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Enhancing listener strategies using a payoff matrix in speech-on-speech masking experiments.
    Thompson ER, Iyer N, Simpson BD, Wakefield GH, Kieras DE, Brungart DS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep 15; 138(3):1297-304. PubMed ID: 26428768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners.
    Ferguson SH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct 15; 116(4 Pt 1):2365-73. PubMed ID: 15532667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Auditory cortex is susceptible to lexical influence as revealed by informational vs. energetic masking of speech categorization.
    Carter JA, Bidelman GM.
    Brain Res; 2021 May 15; 1759():147385. PubMed ID: 33631210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Signal envelope and speech intelligibility differentially impact auditory motion perception.
    Warnecke M, Litovsky RY.
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jul 23; 11(1):15117. PubMed ID: 34302032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
    Croghan NBH, Smith ZM.
    Trends Hear; 2018 Jul 23; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Distinct neural systems recruited when speech production is modulated by different masking sounds.
    Meekings S, Evans S, Lavan N, Boebinger D, Krieger-Redwood K, Cooke M, Scott SK.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul 23; 140(1):8. PubMed ID: 27475128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Effects of noise and talker intelligibility on judgments of accentedness.
    Gittleman S, Van Engen KJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May 23; 143(5):3138. PubMed ID: 29857746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Relationship between listeners' nonnative speech recognition and categorization abilities.
    Atagi E, Bent T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan 23; 137(1):EL44-50. PubMed ID: 25618098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The role of periodicity in perceiving speech in quiet and in background noise.
    Steinmetzger K, Rosen S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec 23; 138(6):3586-99. PubMed ID: 26723315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
    Jin SH, Liu C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov 23; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition.
    Freyman RL, Balakrishnan U, Helfer KS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May 23; 115(5 Pt 1):2246-56. PubMed ID: 15139635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Development of Open-Set Word Recognition in Children: Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Speech Maskers.
    Corbin NE, Bonino AY, Buss E, Leibold LJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 May 23; 37(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 26226605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Effects of speech clarity on recognition memory for spoken sentences.
    Van Engen KJ, Chandrasekaran B, Smiljanic R.
    PLoS One; 2012 May 23; 7(9):e43753. PubMed ID: 22970141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Human phoneme recognition depending on speech-intrinsic variability.
    Meyer BT, Jürgens T, Wesker T, Brand T, Kollmeier B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov 23; 128(5):3126-41. PubMed ID: 21110608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Intelligibility of Noise-Adapted and Clear Speech in Child, Young Adult, and Older Adult Talkers.
    Smiljanic R, Gilbert RC.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Nov 09; 60(11):3069-3080. PubMed ID: 29075748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.