These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

161 related items for PubMed ID: 20693702

  • 1. Equating designs and procedures used in Rasch scaling.
    Skaggs G, Wolfe EW.
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):182-95. PubMed ID: 20693702
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Equating and item banking with the Rasch model.
    Wolfe EW.
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(4):409-34. PubMed ID: 12077465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparing screening approaches to investigate stability of common items in Rasch equating.
    Arce-Ferrer AJ.
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 18180550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE, Rotou O, Twing JS.
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Equating of multi-facet tests across administrations.
    Lunz M, Suanthong S.
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 22089509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q, Wheadon C.
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The impact of data collection design, linking method, and sample size on vertical scaling using the Rasch model.
    Paek I, Young MJ, Yi Q.
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(3):229-48. PubMed ID: 18753693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Practical considerations in equating progress tests.
    Langer MM, Swanson DB.
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(6):509-12. PubMed ID: 20515383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Reliability of performance examinations: revisited.
    Lunz ME, Linacre JM.
    J Appl Meas; 2010; 11(2):172-81. PubMed ID: 20693701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparing concurrent versus fixed parameter equating with common items: using the dichotomous and partial credit models in a mixed-item format test.
    Taherbhai HM, Seo DY.
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 17215567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Test equating: what, why, how?
    Zhu W.
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 1998 Mar; 69(1):11-23. PubMed ID: 9532618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.