These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


185 related items for PubMed ID: 20698736

  • 1. Association between pregnancy complications and small-for-gestational-age birth weight defined by customized fetal growth standard versus a population-based standard.
    Odibo AO, Francis A, Cahill AG, Macones GA, Crane JP, Gardosi J.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2011 Mar; 24(3):411-7. PubMed ID: 20698736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Customized birthweight centiles predict SGA pregnancies with perinatal morbidity.
    McCowan LM, Harding JE, Stewart AW.
    BJOG; 2005 Aug; 112(8):1026-33. PubMed ID: 16045513
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Inverse relationship between birth weight and blood pressure in growth-retarded but not in appropriate for gestational age infants during the first week of life.
    Smal JC, Uiterwaal CS, Bruinse HW, Steendijk P, van Bel F.
    Neonatology; 2009 Aug; 96(2):86-92. PubMed ID: 19225240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Population standards of birth weight underestimate fetal growth abnormalities in diabetic pregnancies.
    Kase BA, Cormier CM, Costantine MM, Hutchinson M, Ramin SM, Saade GR, Monga M, Blackwell SC.
    Am J Perinatol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 22105433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The customised growth potential: an international research tool to study the epidemiology of fetal growth.
    Gardosi J, Figueras F, Clausson B, Francis A.
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 25(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 21133964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Small for gestational age neonates--are we missing some by only using standard population growth standards and does it matter?
    Narchi H, Skinner A, Williams B.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Jan; 23(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 19565425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Customized growth charts for twin gestations to optimize identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses at risk of intrauterine fetal death.
    Odibo AO, Cahill AG, Goetzinger KR, Harper LM, Tuuli MG, Macones GA.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 41(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 23334992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The use of customised versus population-based birthweight standards in predicting perinatal mortality.
    Zhang X, Platt RW, Cnattingius S, Joseph KS, Kramer MS.
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):474-7. PubMed ID: 17378820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction in a socio-economically disadvantaged region.
    Kleijer ME, Dekker GA, Heard AR.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2005 Jul; 18(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 16105788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Identification of small for gestational age by population-based and customized growth charts in newborns of obese and normal-weight primiparous women.
    Lauring JR, Gupta M, Kunselman AR, Repke JT, Pauli JM.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(21):3570-4. PubMed ID: 26755451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of customization and use of a fetal growth standard on the association between birthweight percentile and adverse perinatal outcome.
    Sovio U, Smith GCS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S738-S744. PubMed ID: 29199029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Association between small for gestational age and intrauterine fetal death: comparing a customized South Korean growth standard versus a population-based fetal growth chart.
    Moon M, Baek MJ, Ahn E, Odibo AO.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Mar; 29(6):872-4. PubMed ID: 25853216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Maternal sleep deprivation is a risk factor for small for gestational age: a cohort study.
    Abeysena C, Jayawardana P, DE A Seneviratne R.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Aug; 49(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 19694692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Distinguishing pathological from constitutional small for gestational age births in population-based studies.
    Ananth CV, Vintzileos AM.
    Early Hum Dev; 2009 Oct; 85(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 19786331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Risk of morbid perinatal outcomes in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies: customized compared with conventional standards of fetal growth.
    Larkin JC, Hill LM, Speer PD, Simhan HN.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jan; 119(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 22183207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. New definition of small for gestational age based on fetal growth potential.
    Gardosi J.
    Horm Res; 2006 Jan; 65 Suppl 3():15-8. PubMed ID: 16612109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [To born small for gestational age may depend on the growth curve used].
    Ayerza Casas A, Rodríguez Martínez G, Samper Villagrasa MP, Ventura Faci P.
    Nutr Hosp; 2011 Jan; 26(4):752-8. PubMed ID: 22470020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Infants of diabetic mothers with abnormal fetal growth missed by standard growth charts.
    Narchi H, Skinner A.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 29(7):609-13. PubMed ID: 19757264
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Birth weight and long-term metabolic outcomes: does the definition of smallness matter?
    Verkauskiene R, Figueras F, Deghmoun S, Chevenne D, Gardosi J, Levy-Marchal M.
    Horm Res; 2008 Oct; 70(5):309-15. PubMed ID: 18824870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.