These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


243 related items for PubMed ID: 20700071

  • 1. The porous polyethylene/bioglass spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 170 cases.
    Ma X, Schou KR, Maloney-Schou M, Harwin FM, Ng JD.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 20700071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Complications of primary placement of motility post in porous polyethylene implants during enucleation.
    Yazici B, Akova B, Sanli O.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):828-834. PubMed ID: 17362860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Late exposure of the bioceramic orbital implant.
    Wang JK, Lai PC, Liao SL.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jan; 147(1):162-170.e1. PubMed ID: 18571617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The use of autologous dermis grafts for the reconstruction of the anophthalmic socket.
    Bengoa-González A, Dolores Lago-Llinás M, Martín-Clavijo A, Ling-Tan S.
    Orbit; 2010 Aug; 29(4):183-9. PubMed ID: 20812833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The porous polyethylene (Medpor) spherical orbital implant: a retrospective study of 136 cases.
    Blaydon SM, Shepler TR, Neuhaus RW, White WL, Shore JW.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Sep; 19(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 14506421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The use of vicryl mesh in 200 porous orbital implants: a technique with few exposures.
    Jordan DR, Klapper SR, Gilberg SM.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Jan; 19(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12544793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Safety of unwrapped spherical orbital implants.
    Perry JD, Tam RC.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 20(4):281-4. PubMed ID: 15266141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The bioceramic implant: evaluation of implant exposures in 419 implants.
    Jordan DR, Klapper SR, Gilberg SM, Dutton JJ, Wong A, Mawn L.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jul; 26(2):80-2. PubMed ID: 20305504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Free orbital fat graft to prevent porous polyethylene orbital implant exposure in patients with retinoblastoma.
    Kim NJ, Choung HK, Khwarg SI, Yu YS.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Jul; 21(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 16052135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The bioceramic orbital implant: experience with 107 implants.
    Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA.
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2003 Mar; 19(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 12644759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.