These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

235 related items for PubMed ID: 20707455

  • 1. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech.
    Calandruccio L, Dhar S, Bradlow AR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):860-9. PubMed ID: 20707455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L, Bradlow AR, Dhar S.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Masking release effects of a standard and a regional linguistic variety.
    Brouwer S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL237. PubMed ID: 28863622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Masking release due to linguistic and phonetic dissimilarity between the target and masker speech.
    Calandruccio L, Brouwer S, Van Engen KJ, Dhar S, Bradlow AR.
    Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 23800811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Increase in speech recognition due to linguistic mismatch between target and masker speech: monolingual and simultaneous bilingual performance.
    Calandruccio L, Zhou H.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Jun 01; 57(3):1089-97. PubMed ID: 24167230
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise.
    Van Engen KJ, Bradlow AR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jan 01; 121(1):519-26. PubMed ID: 17297805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of linguistic experience on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral masker modulation.
    Calandruccio L, Buss E, Hall JW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar 01; 135(3):1335-43. PubMed ID: 24606272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Does the degree of linguistic experience (native versus nonnative) modulate the degree to which listeners can benefit from a delay between the onset of the maskers and the onset of the target speech?
    Ben-David BM, Avivi-Reich M, Schneider BA.
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov 01; 341():9-18. PubMed ID: 27496539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Phoneme recognition in vocoded maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
    Phatak SA, Grant KW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug 01; 136(2):859-66. PubMed ID: 25096119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE, Wang LM.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr 15; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Informational masking of speech produced by speech-like sounds without linguistic content.
    Chen J, Li H, Li L, Wu X, Moore BC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr 15; 131(4):2914-26. PubMed ID: 22501069
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Informational Masking Effects of Similarity and Uncertainty on Early and Late Stages of Auditory Cortical Processing.
    Niemczak CE, Vander Werff KR.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Apr 15; 42(4):1006-1023. PubMed ID: 33416259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
    Iyer N, Brungart DS, Simpson BD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep 15; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The time-course of linguistic interference during native and non-native speech-in-speech listening.
    Mepham A, Bi Y, Mattys SL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Aug 15; 152(2):954. PubMed ID: 36050191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Native and Non-native Speech Perception by Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Noise- and Speech Maskers.
    Kilman L, Zekveld A, Hällgren M, Rönnberg J.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Apr 24; 19():. PubMed ID: 25910504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise.
    Garcia Lecumberri ML, Cooke M.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr 24; 119(4):2445-54. PubMed ID: 16642857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.
    Calandruccio L, Van Engen K, Dhar S, Bradlow AR.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec 24; 53(6):1458-71. PubMed ID: 20689024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Linguistic contributions to speech-on-speech masking for native and non-native listeners: language familiarity and semantic content.
    Brouwer S, Van Engen KJ, Calandruccio L, Bradlow AR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb 24; 131(2):1449-64. PubMed ID: 22352516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Revisiting the target-masker linguistic similarity hypothesis.
    Brown VA, Dillman-Hasso NH, Li Z, Ray L, Mamantov E, Van Engen KJ, Strand JF.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul 24; 84(5):1772-1787. PubMed ID: 35474415
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effectiveness of Two-Talker Maskers That Differ in Talker Congruity and Perceptual Similarity to the Target Speech.
    Calandruccio L, Buss E, Bowdrie K.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Jul 24; 21():2331216517709385. PubMed ID: 29169315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.