These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

288 related items for PubMed ID: 20718554

  • 21. Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli: II. Effects of changes in stimulus probability.
    Lattal KA.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 429958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Adjusting delay to reinforcement: comparing choice in pigeons and humans.
    Rodriguez ML, Logue AW.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Jan; 14(1):105-17. PubMed ID: 3351438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Imitative learning of stimulus-response and response-outcome associations in pigeons.
    Saggerson AL, George DN, Honey RC.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Jul; 31(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 16045384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Teaching pigeons to commit base-rate neglect.
    Fantino E, Kanevsky IG, Charlton SR.
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Oct; 16(10):820-5. PubMed ID: 16181446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Discriminative proprieties of Vary and Repeat contingencies.
    Souza Ada S, Abreu-Rodrigues J.
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 20619326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Deviations from matching as a measure of preference for alternatives in pigeons.
    Leigland SM.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jul; 32(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 490100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Failure to find a distance effect in pigeon choice.
    Bell MC, Sanabria F.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jul; 108(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28542842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight, but not with food, duration samples in pigeons.
    Grant DS.
    Behav Processes; 2007 Feb 22; 74(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17079092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Long-term behavioral sensitization to apomorphine is independent of conditioning and increases conditioned pecking, but not preference, in pigeons.
    Anselme P, Edeş N, Tabrik S, Güntürkün O.
    Behav Brain Res; 2018 Jan 15; 336():122-134. PubMed ID: 28859998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Prior commitment: Its effect on suboptimal choice in a gambling-like task.
    Zentall TR, Andrews DM, Case JP.
    Behav Processes; 2017 Dec 15; 145():1-9. PubMed ID: 28939341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Rapid acquisition of choice and timing in pigeons.
    Kyonka EG, Grace RC.
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2007 Oct 15; 33(4):392-408. PubMed ID: 17924788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Post-choice information processing by pigeons.
    Martin TI, Zentall TR.
    Anim Cogn; 2005 Oct 15; 8(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 15744507
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.