These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

303 related items for PubMed ID: 2072314

  • 21. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques.
    Chee WW, Donovan TE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):728-32. PubMed ID: 1432791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Dimensional accuracy of a new polyether impression material.
    Endo T, Finger WJ.
    Quintessence Int; 2006 Jan; 37(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 16429703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Surface porosity of stone casts resulting from immersion of addition silicone rubber impressions in disinfectant solutions.
    Hiraguchi H, Kaketani M, Hirose H, Kikuchi H, Yoneyama T.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014 Jan; 27(6):567-9. PubMed ID: 25390872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. An Investigation into the Accuracy of Two Currently Available Dental Impression Materials in the Construction of Cobalt-Chromium Frameworks for Removable Partial Dentures.
    Dubal RK, Friel T, Taylor PD.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Mar; 23(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 26415334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. An alternative putty/wash impression technique.
    Bassi GS.
    Dent Update; 2000 Oct; 27(8):376-8. PubMed ID: 11218529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Reproducibility of sterilized rubber impressions.
    Abdelaziz KM, Hassan AM, Hodges JS.
    Braz Dent J; 2004 Oct; 15(3):209-13. PubMed ID: 15798825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
    Nissan J, Laufer BZ, Brosh T, Assif D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L, Seymour KG, Samarawickrama D, Zou L, Cherukara G, Patel M.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Working times and dimensional accuracy of the one-step putty/wash impression technique.
    Richards MW, Zeiaei S, Bagby MD, Okubo S, Soltani J.
    J Prosthodont; 1998 Dec; 7(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 10196845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Influence of disinfection with peracetic acid and hypochlorite in dimensional alterations of casts obtained from addition silicone and polyether impressions.
    Queiroz DA, Peçanha MM, Neves AC, Frizzera F, Tonetto MR, Silva-Concílio LR.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Nov 01; 14(6):1100-5. PubMed ID: 24858758
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.