These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

66 related items for PubMed ID: 2073879

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. An objective evaluation of retrocochlear function by means of CNT (Cochlear Nerve Tester).
    Latkowski B, Gryczynski M, Jozwiak J, Krupa D, Makowski A, Komorowska A, Sidor W.
    Panminerva Med; 1993 Dec; 35(4):197-200. PubMed ID: 8202331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Restoration of auditory nerve synapses in cats by cochlear implants.
    Ryugo DK, Kretzmer EA, Niparko JK.
    Science; 2005 Dec 02; 310(5753):1490-2. PubMed ID: 16322457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the auditory cortex as a diagnostic tool in cochlear implant candidates.
    Schmidt AM, Weber BP, Becker H.
    Neuroimaging Clin N Am; 2001 May 02; 11(2):297-304, ix. PubMed ID: 11489741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cochlear implants: the view from the brain.
    Middlebrooks JC, Bierer JA, Snyder RL.
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2005 Aug 02; 15(4):488-93. PubMed ID: 16009544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P, Eichele T, Buechler M, Debener S, Jäncke L, Dillier N, Hugdahl K, Meyer M.
    Brain; 2009 Jul 02; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA, Tanaka S, Wong DD, Papsin BC.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct 02; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Guinea pig auditory nerve response triggered by a high density electrode array.
    Jolly CN, Clopton BM, Spelman FA, Lineaweaver SK.
    Med Prog Technol; 1997 Oct 02; 21 Suppl():13-23. PubMed ID: 9413824
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
    McMahon CM, Patuzzi RB, Gibson WP, Sanli H.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun 02; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
    Xi X, Ji F, Han DY, Huang DL, Hong MD, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb 02; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials evoked by multichannel cochlear implant - influence of C levels.
    Jin Y, Shinjo Y, Akamatsu Y, Ogata E, Nakamura M, Kianoush S, Yamasoba T, Kaga K.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar 02; 128(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 18274914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.