These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

122 related items for PubMed ID: 2079173

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. In vitro fatigue resistance of glass ionomer cements used in post-and-core applications.
    Gateau P, Sabek M, Dailey B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Aug; 86(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 11514801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Shear bond strength of amalgam reinforced with a bonding agent and/or dentin pins.
    Sen D, Nayir E, Cetiner F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Apr; 87(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 12011862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Apr; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Evaluation of stainless steel crowns cemented with glass-ionomer and resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements.
    Yilmaz Y, Simsek S, Dalmis A, Gurbuz T, Kocogullari ME.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Apr; 19(2):106-10. PubMed ID: 16764134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns.
    Ayad MF, Rosenstiel SF, Salama M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 9051596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of surface roughness and cement space on crown retention.
    Juntavee N, Millstein PL.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Sep; 68(3):482-6. PubMed ID: 1432766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A comparative study of retentive strengths of zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer cements with stainless steel crowns - an in vitro study.
    Raghunath Reddy MH, Subba Reddy VV, Basappa N.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010 Sep; 28(4):245-50. PubMed ID: 21273711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Supplementing retention through crown/preparation modification: an in vitro study.
    O'Kray H, Marshall TS, Braun TM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Mar; 107(3):186-90. PubMed ID: 22385695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Compressive shear strength of core materials and restoring techniques.
    Sahmali SM, Saygili G.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2000 Jun; 20(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 11203569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Retentiveness of dental cements used with metallic implant components.
    Squier RS, Agar JR, Duncan JP, Taylor TD.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001 Jun; 16(6):793-8. PubMed ID: 11769829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.