These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 20804295

  • 1. Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
    McCormick SF, Davis CJ, Brysbaert M.
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1256-66. PubMed ID: 20804295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluating a split fovea model of visual word recognition: effects of case alternation in the two visual fields and in the left and right halves of words presented at the fovea.
    Ellis AW, Brooks J, Lavidor M.
    Neuropsychologia; 2005 Sep; 43(8):1128-37. PubMed ID: 15817170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of word length.
    Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Stachurski M.
    Cortex; 2009 Apr; 45(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 19231478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The importance of interhemispheric transfer for foveal vision: a factor that has been overlooked in theories of visual word recognition and object perception.
    Brysbaert M.
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar; 88(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 14967210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J, Holmqvist K, Lindgren M.
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The mechanisms underlying the interhemispheric integration of information in foveal word recognition: evidence for transcortical inhibition.
    Van der Haegen L, Brysbaert M.
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):81-9. PubMed ID: 20430428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. ERP evidence for the split fovea theory.
    Martin CD, Thierry G, Démonet JF, Roberts M, Nazir T.
    Brain Res; 2007 Dec 14; 1185():212-20. PubMed ID: 17956755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Re-evaluating split-fovea processing in word recognition: effects of fixation location within words.
    Jordan TR, Paterson KB, Kurtev S, Xu M.
    Cortex; 2010 Mar 14; 46(3):298-309. PubMed ID: 19576580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Length, formats, neighbours, hemispheres, and the processing of words presented laterally or at fixation.
    Ellis AW.
    Brain Lang; 2004 Mar 14; 88(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 14967218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
    Van der Haegen L, Brysbaert M, Davis CJ.
    Brain Lang; 2009 Feb 14; 108(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 18657313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.