These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
209 related items for PubMed ID: 20816155
21. Evaluating cervical neoplasia. LEEP as an alternative to cold knife conization. Simmons JR, Anderson L, Hernandez E, Heller PB. J Reprod Med; 1998 Dec; 43(12):1007-13. PubMed ID: 9883402 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Current concepts on the use of IUDs. McCarthy T. Singapore Med J; 1989 Aug 11; 30(4):390-2. PubMed ID: 2814545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M, Beau G. Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Aug 11; 54(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 8063242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Outpatient procedures for cervical dysplasia: a 3 year review of laser vaporisation and LEEP. Lee KE, Koh CF, Watt WF. Med J Malaysia; 1999 Mar 11; 54(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 10972004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Statement on intrauterine devices (IUDs). International Planned Parenthood Federation IPPF. International Medical Advisory Panel IMAP. IPPF Med Bull; 1987 Dec 11; 21(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 12268853 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Missing intrauterine contraceptive device presenting with strings at the anus. Ramsewak S, Rahaman J, Persad P, Narayansingh G. West Indian Med J; 1991 Dec 11; 40(4):185-6. PubMed ID: 1785198 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [The end of IUD marketing in the United States: what does it mean for American women?]. Forrest JD. Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1987 Mar 11; 15(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 12341479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Letter: Case of the "missing strings". Evans GT. Obstet Gynecol; 1974 Jul 11; 44(1):155-6. PubMed ID: 4834810 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The intrauterine device in the present and future. Rivera R, Chi IC, Farr G. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec 11; 5(6):829-32. PubMed ID: 8286697 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the cone biopsy excisor compared with the large loop for electrosurgical excision of cervical lesions. Fischer NR, Alexandarian D, Gagliardi S, Oglesby J, Scribner D, Asuncion C, Mesologitis T. Prim Care Update Ob Gyns; 1998 Jul 01; 5(4):161-162. PubMed ID: 10838301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Impact of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure for cervical dysplasia on sexual function]. Sadoun C, Ohannessian A, Carcopino X, Mauviel F, Boubli L, Agostini A. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Feb 01; 45(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 26705609 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Electrosurgery of cervical changes and its place in cervical cancer prophylaxis]. Rokita W, Stanisławska M, Spaczyński M, Nowak-Markwitz E, Kedzia W. Ginekol Pol; 2009 Nov 01; 80(11):856-60. PubMed ID: 20088401 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Women's willingness and ability to feel the strings of their intrauterine device. Melo J, Tschann M, Soon R, Kuwahara M, Kaneshiro B. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jun 01; 137(3):309-313. PubMed ID: 28218963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. An unusual complication of LEEP cervical conisation with a retained intrauterine device (IUD): a case report. Gül A, Gül Kebapçılar A, Şahin G, Akar S, Çelik Ç. J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Jul 01; 39(5):718-719. PubMed ID: 31018730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]