These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 20816286

  • 1. Anatomic variability in alveolar sites for skeletal anchorage.
    Martinelli FL, Luiz RR, Faria M, Nojima LI.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):252.e1-9; discussion 252-3. PubMed ID: 20816286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. "Safe zones": a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch.
    Poggio PM, Incorvati C, Velo S, Carano A.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16539541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
    Park J, Cho HJ.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Tomographic mapping of mandibular interradicular spaces for placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Monnerat C, Restle L, Mucha JN.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):428.e1-9; discussion 428-9. PubMed ID: 19361724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bicortical vs monocortical orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Brettin BT, Grosland NM, Qian F, Southard KA, Stuntz TD, Morgan TA, Marshall SD, Southard TE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):625-35. PubMed ID: 18984394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Yang L, Li F, Cao M, Chen H, Wang X, Chen X, Yang L, Gao W, Petrone JF, Ding Y.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Three-dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics.
    Silvestrini Biavati A, Tecco S, Migliorati M, Festa F, Panza G, Marzo G, Gherlone E, Tetè S.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 21457458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Transverse skeletal and dentoalveolar changes during growth.
    Hesby RM, Marshall SD, Dawson DV, Southard KA, Casko JS, Franciscus RG, Southard TE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):721-31. PubMed ID: 17169734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary and mandibular interradicular sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement.
    Lim JE, Lee SJ, Kim YJ, Lim WH, Chun YS.
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2009 Nov; 12(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 19840282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Evaluation of cortical bone thickness and root proximity at maxillary interradicular sites for mini-implant placement.
    Sawada K, Nakahara K, Matsunaga S, Abe S, Ide Y.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():1-7. PubMed ID: 22092972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants.
    Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):721.e7-12. PubMed ID: 16769488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
    Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. 'Bone map' for a safe placement of miniscrews generated by computed tomography.
    Hernández LC, Montoto G, Puente Rodríguez M, Galbán L, Martínez V.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jun; 19(6):576-81. PubMed ID: 18422990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Analysis of intra-arch and interarch measurements from digital models with 2 impression materials and a modeling process based on cone-beam computed tomography.
    White AJ, Fallis DW, Vandewalle KS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):456.e1-9; discussion 456-7. PubMed ID: 20362900
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement.
    Lee KJ, Joo E, Kim KD, Lee JS, Park YC, Yu HS.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 19361735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Facio-lingual width of the alveolar base.
    Wonglamsam P, Manosudprasit M, Godfrey K.
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Apr; 19(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 12790350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
    Fayed MM, Pazera P, Katsaros C.
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Distal movement of maxillary molars using miniscrew anchorage in the buccal interradicular region.
    Yamada K, Kuroda S, Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yamashiro T.
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 19123698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of screw diameter on orthodontic skeletal anchorage.
    Morarend C, Qian F, Marshall SD, Southard KA, Grosland NM, Morgan TA, McManus M, Southard TE.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 19651352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements.
    Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):19-25; discussion 25-8. PubMed ID: 19577143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.