These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Cruzan: no rights violated. Robertson JA. Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(5):8-9. PubMed ID: 2228594 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Wicklund v. Lambert. U.S. District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division. Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct 09; 979():1285-90. PubMed ID: 11648429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion: rights or technicalities? A comparison of Roe v. Wade with the abortion decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court. Brown HO. Hum Life Rev; 1975 Oct 09; 1(3):60-74. PubMed ID: 11662181 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD. Am J Law Med; 1976 Oct 09; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Watson DE. Mercer Law Rev; 1991 Oct 09; 42(3):1147-81. PubMed ID: 11651439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cruzan after Dobbs: What Remains of the Constitutional Right to Refuse Treatment? Dresser R. Hastings Cent Rep; 2023 Mar 09; 53(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 37092653 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]