These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

682 related items for PubMed ID: 20831372

  • 21. Effects of sinus membrane perforations on the success of dental implants placed in the augmented sinus.
    Karabuda C, Arisan V, Özyuvaci H.
    J Periodontol; 2006 Dec; 77(12):1991-7. PubMed ID: 17209783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparative clinical results after implant placement in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation.
    Schlegel A, Hamel J, Wichmann M, Eitner S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008 Dec; 23(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 18548926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases.
    Karabuda C, Ozdemir O, Tosun T, Anil A, Olgaç V.
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1436-42. PubMed ID: 11699487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Sinus grafting with a natural fluorohydroxyapatite for immediate load: a study with histologic analysis and histomorphometry.
    Lee CY, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS, Stover JD, Suzuki JB.
    J Oral Implantol; 2009 Oct; 35(4):164-75. PubMed ID: 19813420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Sinus augmentation bone grafts for the provision of dental implants: report of clinical outcome.
    McCarthy C, Patel RR, Wragg PF, Brook IM.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003 Oct; 18(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 12814312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. One-step approach for implant placement and subantral bone regeneration using bovine hydroxyapatite: a 2- to 6-year follow-up study.
    Lambert F, Lecloux G, Rompen E.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Oct; 25(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 20556261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Impact of implant surface and grafting protocol on clinical outcomes of endosseous implants.
    Marchetti C, Pieri F, Trasarti S, Corinaldesi G, Degidi M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007 Oct; 22(3):399-407. PubMed ID: 17622006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants placed in sites augmented with sinus floor elevation associated with vertical ridge augmentation: a retrospective study of 38 consecutive implants with 1- to 7-year follow-up.
    Simion M, Fontana F, Rasperini G, Maiorana C.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Jun; 24(3):208-21. PubMed ID: 15227769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Two-stage maxillary sinus reconstruction with endosseous implants: a prospective study.
    Blomqvist JE, Alberius P, Isaksson S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998 Jun; 13(6):758-66. PubMed ID: 9857586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Placement of posterior maxillary implants in partially edentulous patients with severe bone deficiency using CAD/CAM guidance to avoid sinus grafting: a clinical report of procedure.
    Fortin T, Isidori M, Bouchet H.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jun; 24(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 19344031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Influence of bone augmentation procedures on the short-term prognosis of simultaneously placed implants.
    Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M, Gabbert O, Lorenzo Bermejo J, Eiffler C, Schwarz S.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1232-7. PubMed ID: 22092768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Implant placement in the atrophic posterior maxilla with sinus elevation without bone grafting: a 2-year prospective study.
    Rajkumar GC, Aher V, Ramaiya S, Manjunath GS, Kumar DV.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Oct; 28(2):526-30. PubMed ID: 23527355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mm-long, 4 mm-wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial.
    Esposito M, Cannizzaro G, Soardi E, Pistilli R, Piattelli M, Corvino V, Felice P.
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 5(1):19-33. PubMed ID: 22518377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
    Yamamichi N, Itose T, Neiva R, Wang HL.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Alternative bone expansion technique for implant placement in atrophic edentulous maxilla and mandible.
    Demetriades N, Park JI, Laskarides C.
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Aug; 37(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20662673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Performance of threaded versus sintered porous-surfaced dental implants using open window or indirect osteotome-mediated sinus elevation: a retrospective report.
    Kermalli JY, Deporter DA, Lai JY, Lam E, Atenafu E.
    J Periodontol; 2008 Apr; 79(4):728-36. PubMed ID: 18380568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae.
    Becktor JP, Isaksson S, Sennerby L.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004 Apr; 19(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 14982363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Prospective study on the augmentation of the maxillary sinus with calcium sulfate: histological results.
    De Leonardis D, Pecora GE.
    J Periodontol; 2000 Jun; 71(6):940-7. PubMed ID: 10914797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA, Jovanovic SA, Lozada JL.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009 Jun; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.