These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

207 related items for PubMed ID: 20838834

  • 21. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W, Li G, Wennberg R, Näsström K, Shi XQ.
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK, Potter BJ, Russell CM, Schafer TE, Adair S, Weller RN.
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A, Jones C.
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A, Hintze H, Hörsted-Bindslev P.
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of standard and task-specific enhancement of Digora storage phosphor images for approximal caries diagnosis.
    Møystad A, Svanaes DB, van der Stelt PF, Gröndahl HG, Wenzel A, van Ginkel FC, Kullendorff B, Hintze H, Larheim TA.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):390-6. PubMed ID: 15070842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Influence of displayed image size on radiographic detection of approximal caries.
    Haak R, Wicht MJ, Nowak G, Hellmich M.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jul; 32(4):242-6. PubMed ID: 13679355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Belém MD, Ambrosano GM, Tabchoury CP, Ferreira-Santos RI, Haiter-Neto F.
    Braz Oral Res; 2013 Jul; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 23739784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Kang B-C, Farman AG, Scarfe WC, Goldsmith LJ.
    Caries Res; 1996 Jul; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Influence of tube voltage on radiographic diagnosis of caries in premolars and molars.
    Svenson B, Petersson A.
    Swed Dent J; 1991 Jul; 15(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 1767370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay.
    Nair MK, Ludlow JB, May KN, Nair UP, Johnson MP, Close JM.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Jul; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. TACT imaging of primary caries.
    Tyndall DA, Clifton TL, Webber RL, Ludlow JB, Horton RA.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1997 Aug; 84(2):214-25. PubMed ID: 9269025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Proximal caries detection: Sirona Sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus.
    Khan EA, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, Caplan D.
    Gen Dent; 2005 Aug; 53(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15779222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Accuracy of direct digital radiography for detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth compared with conventional radiography and visual inspection: an in vitro study.
    Dias da Silva PR, Martins Marques M, Steagall W, Medeiros Mendes F, Lascala CA.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Sep; 39(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 20729186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of clinician agreement during visualization of conventional and digitized bitewing radiographs.
    Kimmes NS, Saini TS, Carroll LR.
    Gen Dent; 2006 Sep; 54(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 16776410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. In vitro comparison of digital and conventional bitewing radiographs for the detection of approximal caries in primary teeth exposed and viewed by a new wireless handheld unit.
    Ulusu T, Bodur H, Odabaş ME.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Feb; 39(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 20100920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Detection of caries with conventional digital imaging and tuned aperture computed tomography using CRT monitor and laptop displays.
    Abreu M, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Aug; 88(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 10468469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Radiographic detection of approximal caries: a comparison of dental films and digital imaging systems.
    Syriopoulos K, Sanderink GC, Velders XL, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 10980568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries.
    Janhom A, van Ginkel FC, van Amerongen JP, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 May; 30(3):166-71. PubMed ID: 11420630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K, Nakayama E, Shimizu M, Goto TK, Chikui T, Kawazu T, Okamura K.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The efficacy of caries detection using three intraoral films under different processing conditions.
    Ludlow JB, Platin E, Delano EO, Clifton L.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 128(10):1401-8. PubMed ID: 9332141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.