These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

275 related items for PubMed ID: 20839703

  • 1. A randomized, prospective study of total hip wound closure with resorbable subcuticular staples.
    Fisher DA, Bengero LL, Clapp BC, Burgess M.
    Orthopedics; 2010 Sep 07; 33(9):665. PubMed ID: 20839703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Randomized controlled trial of wound complication rates of subcuticular suture vs staples for skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Basha SL, Rochon ML, Quiñones JN, Coassolo KM, Rust OA, Smulian JC.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep 07; 203(3):285.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20816153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.
    Nitsche J, Howell C, Howell T.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr 07; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A prospective randomised comparison of 2 skin closure techniques in primary total hip arthroplasty surgery.
    Rui M, Zheng X, Sun SS, Li CY, Zhang XC, Guo KJ, Zhao FC, Pang Y.
    Hip Int; 2018 Jan 07; 28(1):101-105. PubMed ID: 29148019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
    Rousseau JA, Girard K, Turcot-Lemay L, Thomas N.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar 07; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A new suture for hair transplantation: poliglecaprone 25.
    Bernstein RM, Rassman WR, Rashid N.
    Dermatol Surg; 2001 Jan 07; 27(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 11231232
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN, Wing DA, McNulty JA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr 07; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Skin closure. A prospective randomized study].
    Lundblad R, Simensen HV, Wiig JN, Niels Grüner OP.
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1989 Apr 30; 109(12):1307-9. PubMed ID: 2660322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Renal transplant incision closure using new absorbable subcuticular staple device.
    Tellis VA.
    Clin Transplant; 2007 Apr 30; 21(3):410-2. PubMed ID: 17488393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: Running Subcuticular Closure Enables the Most Robust Perfusion After TKA: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Wyles CC, Jacobson SR, Houdek MT, Larson DR, Taunton MJ, Sim FH, Sierra RJ, Trousdale RT.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan 30; 474(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 25733009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
    Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW.
    J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct 30; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after open gastrointestinal surgery: a phase 3, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Tsujinaka T, Yamamoto K, Fujita J, Endo S, Kawada J, Nakahira S, Shimokawa T, Kobayashi S, Yamasaki M, Akamaru Y, Miyamoto A, Mizushima T, Shimizu J, Umeshita K, Ito T, Doki Y, Mori M, Clinical Study Group of Osaka University on Section of Risk Management.
    Lancet; 2013 Sep 28; 382(9898):1105-12. PubMed ID: 24075050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Wound complications in joint arthroplasty: comparing traditional and modern methods of skin closure.
    Patel RM, Cayo M, Patel A, Albarillo M, Puri L.
    Orthopedics; 2012 May 28; 35(5):e641-6. PubMed ID: 22588404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM, Dow ML, Lohse CM, Tessmer-Tuck JA.
    BJOG; 2019 Mar 28; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of incision closures with subcuticular and percutaneous staples.
    Dresner HS, Hilger PA.
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009 Mar 28; 11(5):320-6. PubMed ID: 19797094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [A prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty].
    Mengal B, Aebi J, Rodriguez A, Lemaire R.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Feb 01; 87(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 11240535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. MONOCRYL and DERMABOND vs Staples in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through a Lateral Skin Incision: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Patient-Centered Assessment Tool.
    Glennie RA, Korczak A, Naudie DD, Bryant DM, Howard JL.
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug 01; 32(8):2431-2435. PubMed ID: 28438450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Clay FS, Walsh CA, Walsh SR.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May 01; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Adhesive strips versus subcuticular suture for mediansternotomy wound closure.
    Lazar HL, McCann J, Fitzgerald CA, Cabral HJ.
    J Card Surg; 2011 Jul 01; 26(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 21554389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.