These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


208 related items for PubMed ID: 20842494

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Supracervical Hysterectomy Is Protective against Mesh Complications after Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 12,189 Patients.
    Dallas K, Taich L, Kuhlmann P, Rogo-Gupta L, Eilber K, Anger JT, Scott V.
    J Urol; 2022 Mar; 207(3):669-676. PubMed ID: 34694142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Transvaginal Versus Transabdominal Placement of Synthetic Mesh at Time of Sacrocolpopexy.
    Nosti PA, Carter CM, Sokol AI, Tefera E, Iglesia CB, Park AJ, Gutman RE.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 26571429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK, Occhino JA, Bews KA, Habermann EB, Linder BJ.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb 01; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Baines G, Price N, Jefferis H, Cartwright R, Jackson SR.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Sep 01; 30(9):1475-1481. PubMed ID: 31041499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Transvaginal Excision of an Eroded Sacrocolpopexy Mesh by Using Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Equipment.
    Mohr S, Siegenthaler F, Imboden S, Kuhn A, Mueller MD.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Sep 01; 24(7):1079-1080. PubMed ID: 28400220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Rate of Mesh Erosion After Sacrocolpopexy With Concurrent Supracervical Compared With Total Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nassif J, Yadav GS, Orejuela FJ, Turrentine MA.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Sep 01; 140(3):412-420. PubMed ID: 35926201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?
    Norinho de Oliveira P, Bourdel N, Rabischong B, Canis M, Botchorishvili R.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb 01; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 26408228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effect of operative technique on mesh exposure in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Warner WB, Vora S, Hurtado EA, Welgoss JA, Horbach NS, von Pechmann WS.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012 Feb 01; 18(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 22453322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Mesh Exposure Following Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Sacrocolpopexy.
    Woodburn KL, El Haraki AS, Sokol AI, Gutman RE, Matthews CA.
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Nov 01; 33(11):3213-3220. PubMed ID: 35157096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Vaginal versus robotic hysterectomy and concomitant pelvic support surgery: a comparison of postoperative vaginal length and sexual function.
    De La Cruz JF, Myers EM, Geller EJ.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014 Nov 01; 21(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 24780383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Transvaginal Single-Port Laparoscopy Sacrocolpopexy.
    Chen Y, Li J, Zhang Y, Hua K.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Nov 01; 25(4):585-588. PubMed ID: 29107118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
    Linder BJ, Gershman B, Bews KA, Glasgow AE, Occhino JA.
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019 Nov 01; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Risk factors for mesh erosion after vaginal sling procedures for urinary incontinence.
    Kokanali MK, Doğanay M, Aksakal O, Cavkaytar S, Topçu HO, Özer İ.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Jun 01; 177():146-50. PubMed ID: 24793930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.