These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

521 related items for PubMed ID: 20853262

  • 1. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Pourjavan S.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the corneal biomechanical properties with the Ocular Response Analyzer® (ORA) in African and Caucasian normal subjects and patients with glaucoma.
    Detry-Morel M, Jamart J, Hautenauven F, Pourjavan S.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 90(2):e118-24. PubMed ID: 21989354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
    Hirneiss C, Neubauer AS, Yu A, Kampik A, Kernt M.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
    Tejwani S, Devi S, Dinakaran S, Shetty R, Meshram P, Francis M, Sinha Roy A.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Assessment of corneal biomechanical properties in normal tension glaucoma and comparison with open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, and normal eyes.
    Grise-Dulac A, Saad A, Abitbol O, Febbraro JL, Azan E, Moulin-Tyrode C, Gatinel D.
    J Glaucoma; 2012 Sep; 21(7):486-9. PubMed ID: 21734593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Shah S, Laiquzzaman M, Mantry S, Cunliffe I.
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 36(6):508-13. PubMed ID: 18954311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.
    Vinciguerra R, Rehman S, Vallabh NA, Batterbury M, Czanner G, Choudhary A, Cheeseman R, Elsheikh A, Willoughby CE.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Corneal Biomechanical Properties of Various Types of Glaucoma and Their Impact on Measurement of Intraocular Pressure.
    Zhang Y, Bian A, Hang Q, Li L, Zhang S, Cheng G, Zhou Q.
    Ophthalmic Res; 2023 Jan; 66(1):749-756. PubMed ID: 36958304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The relationship between measurement method and corneal structure on apparent intraocular pressure in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
    Nessim M, Mollan SP, Wolffsohn JS, Laiquzzaman M, Sivakumar S, Hartley S, Shah S.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2013 Apr; 36(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 23253796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Matsuura M, Murata H, Fujino Y, Yanagisawa M, Nakao Y, Tokumo K, Nakakura S, Kiuchi Y, Asaoka R.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of ocular response analyzer parameters in primary open angle glaucoma and exfoliative glaucoma patients.
    Beyazyıldız E, Beyazyıldız O, Arifoğlu HB, Altıntaş AK, Köklü SG.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jul; 62(7):782-7. PubMed ID: 25116770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M, Dariel R, Giraud JM, Verret C, Fenolland JR, Crochelet O, May F, Maurin JF, Renard JP.
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M, Lewis SE, Pensyl D, Gerhardt G, Halverson KD, Qualls C.
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Changes in biomechanical properties of the ocular fibrous tunic in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma in response to drug-induced stress-relief tests].
    Makashova NV, Vasilyeva AE.
    Vestn Oftalmol; 2017 Aug; 133(4):31-36. PubMed ID: 28980563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.