These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

268 related items for PubMed ID: 20858829

  • 1. Improvement of image quality of low radiation dose abdominal CT by increasing contrast enhancement.
    Watanabe H, Kanematsu M, Miyoshi T, Goshima S, Kondo H, Moriyama N, Bae KT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Oct; 195(4):986-92. PubMed ID: 20858829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.
    Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Imuta M, Nakaura T, Ryu D, Morishita S, Sultana S, Sato N, Yamashita Y.
    Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):945-51. PubMed ID: 16237140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A prospective evaluation of the contrast, radiation dose and image quality of contrast-enhanced CT scans of paediatric abdomens using a low-concentration iodinated contrast agent and low tube voltage combined with 70% ASIR algorithm.
    Wang X, Zhong Y, Hu L, Xue L, Shi M, Qiu H, Li J.
    Int J Clin Pract; 2016 Sep; 70 Suppl 9B():B16-21. PubMed ID: 27577509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
    Schindera ST, Graca P, Patak MA, Abderhalden S, von Allmen G, Vock P, Szucs-Farkas Z.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Oct; 44(10):650-5. PubMed ID: 19724236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Radiation dose reduction for chest CT with non-linear adaptive filters.
    Singh S, Digumarthy SR, Back A, Shepard JA, Kalra MK.
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar 01; 54(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 23185071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
    Kalra MK, Woisetschläger M, Dahlström N, Singh S, Lindblom M, Choy G, Quick P, Schmidt B, Sedlmair M, Blake MA, Persson A.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012 Mar 01; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Optimized contrast-enhanced CT protocols for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: technical aspects of single-phase versus multiphase CT imaging.
    Brechtel K, Klein M, Vogel M, Mueller M, Aschoff P, Beyer T, Eschmann SM, Bares R, Claussen CD, Pfannenberg AC.
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Mar 01; 47(3):470-6. PubMed ID: 16513616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Seesaw balancing radiation dose and i.v. contrast dose: evaluation of a new abdominal CT protocol for reducing age-specific risk.
    Fält T, Söderberg M, Hörberg L, Carlgren I, Leander P.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb 01; 200(2):383-8. PubMed ID: 23345361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Lowering kilovoltage to reduce radiation dose in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT: initial assessment of a prototype automated kilovoltage selection tool.
    Hough DM, Fletcher JG, Grant KL, Fidler JL, Yu L, Geske JR, Carter RE, Raupach R, Schmidt B, Flohr T, McCollough CH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov 01; 199(5):1070-7. PubMed ID: 23096181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Application of adaptive non-linear 2D and 3D postprocessing filters for reduced dose abdominal CT.
    Borgen L, Kalra MK, Laerum F, Hachette IW, Fredriksson CH, Sandborg M, Smedby O.
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr 01; 53(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 22362136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Low-dose abdominal CT protocols with a tube voltage setting of 100 kVp or 80 kVp: Performance of radiation dose reduction and influence on visual contrast.
    Nakaura T, Kidoh M, Nakamura S, Doi Y, Shiraishi S, Awai K, Harada K, Yamashita Y.
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Aug 01; 69(8):804-11. PubMed ID: 24907185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Image fusion in dual energy computed tomography for detection of various anatomic structures--effect on contrast enhancement, contrast-to-noise ratio, signal-to-noise ratio and image quality.
    Paul J, Bauer RW, Maentele W, Vogl TJ.
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov 01; 80(2):612-9. PubMed ID: 21376494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Abdomen: angiography with 16-detector CT--comparison of image quality and radiation dose between studies with 0.625-mm and those with 1.25-mm collimation.
    Miyoshi T, Kanematsu M, Kondo H, Goshima S, Tsuge Y, Hatcho A, Shiratori Y, Onozuka M, Moriyama N, Bae KT.
    Radiology; 2008 Oct 01; 249(1):142-50. PubMed ID: 18796672
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. CT of the pancreas: comparison of anatomic structure depiction, image quality, and radiation exposure between 320-detector volumetric images and 64-detector helical images.
    Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Nishibori H, Sakurai K, Miyazawa D, Watanabe H, Kondo H, Shiratori Y, Onozuka M, Moriyama N, Bae KT.
    Radiology; 2011 Jul 01; 260(1):139-47. PubMed ID: 21406629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.