These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

237 related items for PubMed ID: 20880140

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A pilot in vitro biomechanical comparison of locking compression plate fixation and kerf-cut cylinder fixation for ventral fusion of fourth and fifth equine cervical vertebrae.
    Reardon R, Bailey R, Walmsley J, Heller J, Lischer C.
    Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2009; 22(5):371-9. PubMed ID: 19718487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC.
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint: a biomechanical comparison of two 7-hole 3.5-mm broad and two 5-hole 4.5-mm narrow dynamic compression plates.
    Watt BC, Edwards RB, Markel MD, McCabe R, Wilson DG.
    Vet Surg; 2002 Apr; 31(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 11778172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA, Crawford NR.
    Spine J; 2007 Apr; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Veterinary Locking Plates to Monocortical Screw/Polymethylmethacrylate Fixation in Canine Cadaveric Cervical Vertebral Column.
    Hettlich BF, Fosgate GT, Litsky AS.
    Vet Surg; 2017 Jan; 46(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 27902850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. In vitro biomechanical comparison of a modified 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation with a 5.5 mm locking compression plate fixation of osteotomized equine third metacarpal bones.
    Sod GA, Riggs LM, Mitchell CF, Martin GS, Gill MS.
    Vet Surg; 2010 Oct; 39(7):833-8. PubMed ID: 20459499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. In vitro biomechanical comparison of 3.5 string of pearl plate fixation to 3.5 locking compression plate fixation in a canine fracture gap model.
    Malenfant RC, Sod GA.
    Vet Surg; 2014 May; 43(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 24720361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro biomechanical comparison of multistrand cables with conventional cervical stabilization.
    Weis JC, Cunningham BW, Kanayama M, Parker L, McAfee PC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Sep 15; 21(18):2108-14. PubMed ID: 8893435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.