These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Diagnostic Studies for the Evaluation of Peripheral Artery Disease. Banchs Viña H, Claudio H, Mesa M, López-Candales A. Bol Asoc Med P R; 2015; 107(3):42-5. PubMed ID: 26742195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Advances in vascular imaging. Rowe VL, Tucker SW. Surg Clin North Am; 2004 Oct; 84(5):1189-202, v. PubMed ID: 15364551 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasonography for measuring carotid artery stenosis. Modaresi KB, Cox TC, Summers PE, Jarosz JM, Verma H, Taylor PR, Padayachee TS. Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1422-6. PubMed ID: 10583289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The role of advanced cardiac imaging methods in coronary artery disease]. Kiraç S. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2008 Jul; 8 Suppl 1():1-4. PubMed ID: 18611832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance angiography in the follow-up of distal lower-extremity bypass surgery: comparison with duplex ultrasound and digital subtraction angiography. Meissner OA, Verrel F, Tató F, Siebert U, Ramirez H, Ruppert V, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M. J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Nov; 15(11):1269-77. PubMed ID: 15525747 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Magnetic resonance imaging in peripheral arterial disease: reproducibility of the assessment of morphological and functional vascular status. Versluis B, Backes WH, van Eupen MG, Jaspers K, Nelemans PJ, Rouwet EV, Teijink JA, Mali WP, Schurink GW, Wildberger JE, Leiner T. Invest Radiol; 2011 Jan; 46(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 21102349 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnosis of graft coronary artery disease. Kass M, Allan R, Haddad H. Curr Opin Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 22(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 17284994 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Innovations in imaging for chronic total occlusions: a glimpse into the future of angiography's blind-spot. Courtney BK, Munce NR, Anderson KJ, Thind AS, Leung G, Radau PE, Foster FS, Vitkin IA, Schwartz RS, Dick AJ, Wright GA, Strauss BH. Eur Heart J; 2008 Mar; 29(5):583-93. PubMed ID: 18238930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An evaluation of methods for imaging and quantifying coronary and carotid lumen stenosis and atherosclerosis. Crouse JR, Thompson CJ. Circulation; 1993 Mar; 87(3 Suppl):II17-33. PubMed ID: 8443919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Technology Insight: magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of patients with peripheral artery disease. Dellegrottaglie S, Sanz J, Macaluso F, Einstein AJ, Raman S, Simonetti OP, Rajagopalan S. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med; 2007 Dec; 4(12):677-87. PubMed ID: 18033232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What are current preprocedure imaging requirements for carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: have magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography made a difference? Maldonado TS. Semin Vasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 20(4):205-15. PubMed ID: 18082837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]