These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

397 related items for PubMed ID: 20952771

  • 1. Irrelevant onsets cause inhibition of return regardless of attentional set.
    Schreij D, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1725-9. PubMed ID: 20952771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention.
    Folk CL, Remington RW, Wu SC.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):308-13. PubMed ID: 19304620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering.
    Schreij D, Theeuwes J, Olivers CN.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):672-82. PubMed ID: 20348574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
    Zhou X, Chen Q.
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N, Harrison S, Pratt J.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The time course of attentional capture under dual-task conditions.
    Santangelo V, Botta F, Lupiáñez J, Spence C.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 21258904
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A static color discontinuity can capture spatial attention when the target is an abrupt-onset singleton.
    Burnham BR, Neely JH.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):831-41. PubMed ID: 18665729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Breaking through the attentional window: capture by abrupt onsets versus color singletons.
    Gaspelin N, Ruthruff E, Lien MC, Jung K.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Oct; 74(7):1461-74. PubMed ID: 22806409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effects of implicit attentional learning and habituation on inhibition of return.
    Wolf K, Ebeling D, Müller NG.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):26-41. PubMed ID: 19304594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The role of relational information in contingent capture.
    Becker SI, Folk CL, Remington RW.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1460-76. PubMed ID: 20919781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Contingent attentional capture by top-down control settings: converging evidence from event-related potentials.
    Lien MC, Ruthruff E, Goodin Z, Remington RW.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Jun; 34(3):509-30. PubMed ID: 18505320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm.
    Moore KS, Weissman DH.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1495-509. PubMed ID: 20675796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
    Anderson BA, Folk CL.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Larger IOR effects following forget than following remember instructions depend on exogenous attentional withdrawal and target localization.
    Taylor TL, Fawcett JM.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1790-814. PubMed ID: 21618066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Endogenous saccade preparation does not produce inhibition of return: failure to replicate Rafal, Calabresi, Brennan, & Sciolto (1989).
    Chica AB, Klein RM, Rafal RD, Hopfinger JB.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1193-206. PubMed ID: 20731522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. On the generality of the contingent orienting hypothesis.
    Yeh SL, Liao HI.
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 18614130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D, Egeth HE.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A, Schubö A.
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Nonspatial interdimensional attentional capture.
    Inukai T, Kawahara J, Kumada T.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Apr; 72(3):658-66. PubMed ID: 20348572
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation.
    Brockmole JR, Boot WR.
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):808-15. PubMed ID: 19485693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.