These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

294 related items for PubMed ID: 20953566

  • 1. An evaluation of the fit of metal-ceramic restorations made with an autoclaved silicone-based impression material.
    Kollefrath R, Savary M, Schwela J.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Jul 01; 11(4):E063-70. PubMed ID: 20953566
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A quick esthetic remount cast for all-ceramic restorations.
    Hansen PA, Gist J.
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Aug 01; 19(6):494-6. PubMed ID: 20456029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K, Ludwig K, Kern M.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct 01; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Precision of fit of two margin designs for metal-ceramic crowns.
    Limkangwalmongkol P, Chiche GJ, Blatz MB.
    J Prosthodont; 2007 Oct 01; 16(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 17451481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Evaluation of margin angles of collarless metal ceramic restorations.
    Dalvit DL, Parker MH, Cameron SM, Hawkins MC, Agar JR, Brousseau JS.
    Gen Dent; 2004 Oct 01; 52(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 15101310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling.
    Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J.
    J Dent; 2010 Jul 01; 38(7):553-9. PubMed ID: 20381576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the fit of Procera crowns made from stone with those made from polyurethane resin.
    Rahme HY, Adib SM, Zebouni EA, Bechara BB, Rifai KT.
    Gen Dent; 2009 Jul 01; 57(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 19552368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Developing an optimal emergence profile of the definitive restoration with a modified impression cap technique for ITI solid abutment.
    Kuo SB, Hong HH, Tsai TP, Shen YF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec 01; 88(6):646-8. PubMed ID: 12488861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O, Decker M, Wittstock F, Kuepper H, Guentsch A.
    J Dent; 2014 Jun 01; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Adhesion of restorations to impression materials.
    Millstein PL, Maya A, Segura JC.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995 Jun 01; 8(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7575963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Accurate impression technique: a key to successful prosthetics.
    Rubinstein S.
    Dent Today; 2010 Oct 01; 29(10):154-7. PubMed ID: 21086806
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Indirect fabrication of multiple post-and-core patterns with a vinyl polysiloxane matrix.
    Sabbak SA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov 01; 88(5):555-7. PubMed ID: 12474010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec 01; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of the marginal fit of pressable ceramic to metal ceramic restorations.
    Holden JE, Goldstein GR, Hittelman EL, Clark EA.
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Dec 01; 18(8):645-8. PubMed ID: 19682215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep 01; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The abutment duplication technique: a novel protocol for cementable implant-supported restorations.
    Cocchetto R, Resch I, Castagna M, Vincenzi G, Celletti R.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2010 Aug 01; 30(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 20664844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A novel technique using a coded healing abutment for the fabrication of a CAD/CAM titanium abutment for an implant-supported restoration.
    Grossmann Y, Pasciuta M, Finger IM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar 01; 95(3):258-61. PubMed ID: 16543025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Impression technique for ovate pontics.
    de Vasconcellos DK, Volpato CÂ, Zani IM, Bottino MA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jan 01; 105(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 21194589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reducing the failure potential of ceramic-based restorations. Part 1: Metal-ceramic crowns and bridges.
    Anusavice KJ.
    Gen Dent; 1996 Jan 01; 44(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 9515390
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Metal-ceramic restorations--custom characterization with pink porcelain.
    Garcia LT, Verrett RG.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2004 Apr 01; 25(4):242, 244, 246 passim. PubMed ID: 15645860
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.