These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

119 related items for PubMed ID: 20968357

  • 1. Quantitative estimation of minor conductive hearing loss with distortion product otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig.
    Olzowy B, Deppe C, Arpornchayanon W, Canis M, Strieth S, Kummer P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):1845-52. PubMed ID: 20968357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Estimation of Minor Conductive Hearing Loss in Humans Using Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions.
    Marcrum SC, Kummer P, Steffens T.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Oct; 38(4):391-398. PubMed ID: 28169838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy of velocity distortion product otoacoustic emissions for estimating mechanically based hearing loss.
    Turcanu D, Dalhoff E, Müller M, Zenner HP, Gummer AW.
    Hear Res; 2009 May; 251(1-2):17-28. PubMed ID: 19233253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of the individual DPOAE growth behavior on DPOAE level variations caused by conductive hearing loss and elevated intracranial pressure.
    Deppe C, Kummer P, Gürkov R, Olzowy B.
    Ear Hear; 2013 May; 34(1):122-31. PubMed ID: 22968426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Effect of inner ear hearing loss on delayed otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) and distortion products (DPOAE)].
    Hoth S.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Dec; 75(12):709-18. PubMed ID: 9081275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Middle ear and cochlear disorders result in different DPOAE growth behaviour: implications for the differentiation of sound conductive and cochlear hearing loss.
    Gehr DD, Janssen T, Michaelis CE, Deingruber K, Lamm K.
    Hear Res; 2004 Jul; 193(1-2):9-19. PubMed ID: 15219315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Subclinical conductive hearing loss significantly reduces otoacoustic emission amplitude: Implications for test performance.
    Kreitmayer C, Marcrum SC, Picou EM, Steffens T, Kummer P.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 123():195-201. PubMed ID: 31129459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Fine alterations of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after moderate acoustic overexposure in guinea pigs.
    Kossowski M, Mom T, Guitton M, Poncet JL, Bonfils P, Avan P.
    Audiology; 2001 Aug; 40(3):113-22. PubMed ID: 11465293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Two-source interference as the major reason for auditory-threshold estimation error based on DPOAE input-output functions in normal-hearing subjects.
    Dalhoff E, Turcanu D, Vetešník A, Gummer AW.
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():67-82. PubMed ID: 23268357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Factors affecting sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions to ototoxic hearing loss.
    Reavis KM, Phillips DS, Fausti SA, Gordon JS, Helt WJ, Wilmington D, Bratt GW, Konrad-Martin D.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):875-93. PubMed ID: 18753950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions.
    Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Vonthein R, Zenner HP.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):378-91. PubMed ID: 18382378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Studies of the evaluation of cochlea function with distortion product otoacoustic emission].
    Kashiwamura M.
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1998 Nov; 73(6):641-62. PubMed ID: 10036620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Applying distortion product otoacoustic emission in testing human sensory hearing loss].
    Chen X, Zheng H, Zheng Y.
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2004 May; 35(3):382-4. PubMed ID: 15181843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Changes in distortion product otoacoustic emissions from ears with Menière's disease.
    Kusuki M, Sakashita T, Kubo T, Kyunai K, Ueno K, Hikawa C, Wada T, Nakai Y.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1998 May; 538():78-89. PubMed ID: 9879406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Intra- and intersubject variability of acoustically evoked otoacoustic emissions. II. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions].
    Shehata-Dieler WE, Dieler R, Teichert K, Moser LM.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1999 Jun; 78(6):345-50. PubMed ID: 10439355
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Extraction of sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions by onset-decomposition.
    Vetesník A, Turcanu D, Dalhoff E, Gummer AW.
    Hear Res; 2009 Oct; 256(1-2):21-38. PubMed ID: 19523509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Repeatability of high-frequency distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal-hearing adults.
    Dreisbach LE, Long KM, Lees SE.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):466-79. PubMed ID: 16957498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear microphonics: relationships in patients with and without endolymphatic hydrops.
    Fetterman BL.
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jun; 111(6):946-54. PubMed ID: 11404602
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Detection of hearing loss using 2f2-f1 and 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions.
    Fitzgerald TS, Prieve BA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1165-86. PubMed ID: 16411804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Possibility for quantitative and frequency-specific assessment of auditory threshold with otoacoustic emissions].
    Dreher A, Suckfüll M, Schneeweiss S, Schorn K.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jan; 76(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 9156504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.