These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

122 related items for PubMed ID: 2098942

  • 1. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
    Matthee MJ, Becker PJ, Seeliger JE.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ, Seeliger JE.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Sep; 46(9):467-9. PubMed ID: 1820681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Densitometric evaluation of seven dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ, Seeliger JE.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Feb; 45(2):31-3. PubMed ID: 2385845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ, Seeliger JE, Prinsloo NJ, Swart NG.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Densitometric evaluation of three intra-oral radiographic films.
    Seeliger JE, Prinsloo JJ.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 May; 44(5):177-9. PubMed ID: 2635441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Densitometric evaluation of intra-oral radiographic film-processing solution combinations.
    Swart TJ, Seeliger JE.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1989 Jul; 44(7):281-3. PubMed ID: 2637510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
    Fjellström CA, Fredholm U, Julin P, Rehnmark S.
    Swed Dent J; 1986 Jul; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Sensitometric evaluation of four dental X-ray films using five processing solutions.
    Syriopoulos K, Velders XL, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10522195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB, Platin E, Mol A.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Developing solutions for dental X-ray processors.
    Hedin M.
    Swed Dent J; 1989 Jan; 13(6):261-5. PubMed ID: 2603130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of developer exhaustion on the sensitometric properties of four dental films.
    Syriopoulos K, Velders XL, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Mar; 28(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10522196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Is E-speed dental film more sensitive to storage than D-speed dental film?
    Petersson A, Lindh C, Nilsson M.
    Swed Dent J; 1987 Mar; 11(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 3480614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of a new F speed dental X-ray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films.
    Farman TT, Farman AG.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 10654035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
    Kitagawa H, Farman AG, Wakoh M, Nishikawa K, Kuroyanagi K.
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Densitometric evaluation of four radiographic processing solutions.
    Akdeniz BG, Lomçali G.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 9656875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.
    Kimme-Smith C, Rothschild PA, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Moler C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jan; 152(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2783288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Densitometric properties of rapid manual processing solutions: abbreviated versus complete rapid processing.
    Geist JR, Gleason MJ.
    J Endod; 1995 Apr; 21(4):180-4. PubMed ID: 7673817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A comparative physical evaluation of four X-ray films.
    Egyed M, Shearer DR.
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):11-20. PubMed ID: 10253292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
    Wakoh M, Nishikawa K, Kobayashi N, Farman AG, Kuroyanagi K.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Rapid developing of Ektaspeed dental film by increase of temperature.
    Fredholm U, Julin P.
    Swed Dent J; 1987 Feb; 11(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 3477024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.