These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

108 related items for PubMed ID: 2100658

  • 21. The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb 01; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18264531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Five-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities.
    Demirci M, Sancakli HS.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb 01; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16555657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ, Wetherell JD.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 01; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The use of resin composite pins to improve retention of Class IV resin composite restorations.
    Roberts HW, Hermesch CB, Charlton DG.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 01; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11203830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Fracture resistance of Class II approximal slot restorations.
    Yaman SD, Yetmez M, Türköz E, Akkas N.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Sep 01; 84(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 11005902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Retention design for amalgam restorations: pins versus slots.
    Bailey JH.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan 01; 65(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 2033550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Enamel-dentinal adhesives in amalgam restorations. Review of the literature].
    Cadenaro M, Gregorig G.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2000 Jun 01; 49(6):313-21. PubMed ID: 11189957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effect of grooves on resistance/retention form of Class 2 approximal slot amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Osborne JW, Burgess JO.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Jun 01; 18(5):209-13. PubMed ID: 8152991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. [Optimized pin geometry for improved retention of parapulpal pins in amalgam].
    Neumeyer S, Gernet W, Bötsch H.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Aug 01; 46(8):550-2. PubMed ID: 1817928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Amalgam retention using pins, boxes, and Amalgambond.
    Fischer GM, Stewart GP, Panelli J.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug 01; 6(4):173-5. PubMed ID: 7803002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Large unit restorations. Clinical study].
    van Nieuwenhuysen JP.
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1989 Jun 01; 42(166):295-316. PubMed ID: 2635557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A photoelastic study of stress concentrations produced by retention pins in amalgam restorations.
    Dhuru VB, McLachlan K, Kasloff Z.
    J Dent Res; 1979 Mar 01; 58(3):1060-4. PubMed ID: 370168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Pit-retention of extensive amalgam restorations. Part II--A five-year clinical survey.
    Dannheimer MF.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1985 Jun 01; 40(6):337, 339. PubMed ID: 3909517
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Karezis A.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jun 01; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Jun 01; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.