These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

248 related items for PubMed ID: 21037176

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of configural processing on the perceptual spatial resolution for face features.
    Namdar G, Avidan G, Ganel T.
    Cortex; 2015 Nov; 72():115-123. PubMed ID: 25998751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW, Kaiser MD, Hagen S, Pierce LJ.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN, Collin CA, Boutet I.
    Perception; 2010 May; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Holistic processing does not require configural variability.
    Richler JJ, Palmeri TJ, Gauthier I.
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Aug; 22(4):974-9. PubMed ID: 25367141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B, Tanaka JW.
    J Vis; 2013 Feb 18; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H.
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012 Feb 18; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Configural features in the context of upright and inverted faces.
    Leder H, Candrian G, Huber O, Bruce V.
    Perception; 2001 Feb 18; 30(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 11257979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Faces elicit different scanning patterns depending on task demands.
    Boutet I, Lemieux CL, Goulet MA, Collin CA.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 May 18; 79(4):1050-1063. PubMed ID: 28185225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Perceptual specialization and configural face processing in infancy.
    Zieber N, Kangas A, Hock A, Hayden A, Collins R, Bada H, Joseph JE, Bhatt RS.
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Nov 18; 116(3):625-39. PubMed ID: 23994509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effect of processing partial information in dynamic face perception.
    Alp N, Lale G, Saglam C, Sayim B.
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr 29; 14(1):9794. PubMed ID: 38684721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.
    Tanaka JW, Quinn PC, Xu B, Maynard K, Huxtable N, Lee K, Pascalis O.
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Aug 29; 124():36-49. PubMed ID: 24747157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intact attentional orienting towards inverted faces revealed by both manual responses and eye-movement measurement in individuals with Williams syndrome.
    Hirai M, Muramatsu Y, Mizuno S, Kurahashi N, Kurahashi H, Nakamura M.
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2016 Oct 29; 60(10):969-81. PubMed ID: 27476718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.