These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests. Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. Jørgensen S, Dau T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech understanding in noise with an eyeglass hearing aid: asymmetric fitting and the head shadow benefit of anterior microphones. Mens LH. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 21047292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The equivalence of acceptable noise level (ANL) with English, Mandarin, and non-semantic speech: a study across the U.S. and Taiwan. Ho HC, Wu YH, Hsiao SH, Stangl E, Lentz EJ, Bentler RA. Int J Audiol; 2013 Feb; 52(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 23153252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm. Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China. Chen J, Zhang H, Plyler PN, Cao W, Chen J. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Danish hearing in noise test. Nielsen JB, Dau T. Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing. Chen F, Wong LL, Tahmina Q, Azimi B, Hu Y. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring spectral and temporal resolution simultaneously: a comparison between two tests. van Esch TE, Dreschler WA. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jul; 50(7):477-90. PubMed ID: 21506893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Perception of temporally modified speech in auditory neuropathy. Hassan DM. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 21047293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech. Liu C, Azimi B, Tahmina Q, Hu Y. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: age effects. Lister JJ, Roberts RA, Lister FL. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):367-74. PubMed ID: 21299377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness. Li G, Lutman ME, Wang S, Bleeck S. Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Modeling speech intelligibility in quiet and noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Rhebergen KS, Lyzenga J, Dreschler WA, Festen JM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1570-83. PubMed ID: 20329857 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking. Roman N, Woodruff J. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]