These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
655 related items for PubMed ID: 21047291
21. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners. van den Tillaart-Haverkate M, de Ronde-Brons I, Dreschler WA, Houben R. Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation? Hochmuth S, Jürgens T, Brand T, Kollmeier B. Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype. Zokoll MA, Wagener KC, Brand T, Buschermöhle M, Kollmeier B. Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):697-707. PubMed ID: 22762202 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker. Koelewijn T, Zekveld AA, Festen JM, Kramer SE. Ear Hear; 2012 Sep; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech. Yi HG, Phelps JE, Smiljanic R, Chandrasekaran B. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech perception of noise with binary gains. Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech. Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The roles of fundamental frequency contours and sentence context in Mandarin Chinese speech intelligibility. Wang J, Shu H, Zhang L, Liu Z, Zhang Y. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 23862913 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech. Jin IK, Kates JM, Arehart KH. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech-in-noise measures: variable versus fixed speech and noise levels. Wilson RH, McArdle R. Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):708-12. PubMed ID: 22640687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons. Sato H, Morimoto M, Ota R. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The influence of spectral characteristics of early reflections on speech intelligibility. Arweiler I, Buchholz JM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):996-1005. PubMed ID: 21877812 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Measuring the effects of reverberation and noise on sentence intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. George EL, Goverts ST, Festen JM, Houtgast T. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2010 Dec; 53(6):1429-39. PubMed ID: 20689027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]