These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 21047295

  • 1. Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom.
    Howard CS, Munro KJ, Plack CJ.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Dec; 49(12):928-32. PubMed ID: 21047295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W, Bradley JS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Increasing motivation changes subjective reports of listening effort and choice of coping strategy.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA.
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jun; 53(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 24597604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech perception in noise: exploring the effect of linguistic context in children with and without auditory processing disorder.
    Lagacé J, Jutras B, Giguère C, Gagné JP.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):385-95. PubMed ID: 21599614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
    Miller SE, Schlauch RS, Watson PJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine.
    Pohjalainen J, Raitio T, Yrttiaho S, Alku P.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Visual cues and listening effort: individual variability.
    Picou EM, Ricketts TA, Hornsby BW.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 54(5):1416-30. PubMed ID: 21498576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Negative Effect of Acoustic Panels on Listening Effort in a Classroom Environment.
    Amlani AM, Russo TA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(10):805-815. PubMed ID: 27885976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.