These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

170 related items for PubMed ID: 21053071

  • 1. Prognostic factors identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with positive margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Anastasiou I, Tyritzis SI, Adamakis I, Mitropoulos D, Stravodimos KG, Katafigiotis I, Balangas A, Kollias A, Pavlakis K, Constantinides CA.
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2011 Sep; 43(3):715-20. PubMed ID: 21053071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prostate carcinoma with positive margins at radical prostatectomy: role of tumour zonal origin in biochemical recurrence.
    O'Neil LM, Walsh S, Cohen RJ, Lee S.
    BJU Int; 2015 Oct; 116 Suppl 3():42-8. PubMed ID: 26218868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The impact of single positive surgical margin features on biochemical recurrence after robotic radical prostatectomy.
    Evren I, Hacıislamoğlu A, Ekşi M, Yavuzsan AH, Baytekin F, Çolakoğlu Y, Canoğlu D, Tugcu V.
    Int Braz J Urol; 2019 Oct; 45(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 30325603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
    De La Roca RL, Da Cunha IW, Bezerra SM, Da Fonseca FP.
    Int Braz J Urol; 2014 Oct; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate-specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy in adjuvant treatment-naïve patients.
    Ploussard G, Agamy MA, Alenda O, Allory Y, Mouracade P, Vordos D, Hoznek A, Abbou CC, de la Taille A, Salomon L.
    BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1748-54. PubMed ID: 20883488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy.
    Somford DM, van Oort IM, Cosyns JP, Witjes JA, Kiemeney LA, Tombal B.
    World J Urol; 2012 Feb; 30(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 21240506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre.
    Sachdeva A, Veeratterapillay R, Voysey A, Kelly K, Johnson MI, Aning J, Soomro NA.
    BMC Urol; 2017 Oct 02; 17(1):91. PubMed ID: 28969608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Predictive factors and oncological outcomes of persistently elevated prostate-specific antigen in patients following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
    Kumar A, Samavedi S, Mouraviev V, Bates AS, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Patel VR.
    J Robot Surg; 2017 Mar 02; 11(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 27245233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Swindle P, Eastham JA, Ohori M, Kattan MW, Wheeler T, Maru N, Slawin K, Scardino PT.
    J Urol; 2005 Sep 02; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
    Tanimoto R, Fashola Y, Scotland KB, Calvaresi AE, Gomella LG, Trabulsi EJ, Lallas CD.
    BMC Urol; 2015 Apr 08; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers.
    Matti B, Reeves F, Prouse M, Zargar-Shoshtari K.
    Prostate; 2021 Dec 08; 81(16):1428-1434. PubMed ID: 34570379
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?
    Pettenati C, Neuzillet Y, Radulescu C, Hervé JM, Molinié V, Lebret T.
    World J Urol; 2015 Dec 08; 33(12):1973-8. PubMed ID: 25939539
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of robot-assisted and open retropubic radical prostatectomy for risk of biochemical progression in men with positive surgical margins.
    Shapiro EY, Scarberry K, Patel T, Bergman A, Ahn JJ, Sahi N, RoyChoudhury A, Deutch I, McKiernan JM, Benson MC, Badani KK.
    J Endourol; 2014 Feb 08; 28(2):208-13. PubMed ID: 24044423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The importance of surgical margins in prostate cancer.
    Sooriakumaran P, Dev HS, Skarecky D, Ahlering T.
    J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar 08; 113(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 27004601
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Predictive postoperative model for biochemical recurrence in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy as monotherapy.
    Molina Escudero R, Herranz-Amo F, Paez-Borda A, Hernandez Fernandez C.
    Arch Esp Urol; 2014 Apr 08; 67(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 24840591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.