These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


596 related items for PubMed ID: 21075549

  • 1. Radiobiological characterization of two therapeutic proton beams with different initial energy spectra used at the Institut Curie Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.
    Calugaru V, Nauraye C, Noël G, Giocanti N, Favaudon V, Mégnin-Chanet F.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Nov 15; 81(4):1136-43. PubMed ID: 21075549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Variations in the RBE for cell killing along the depth-dose profile of a modulated proton therapy beam.
    Britten RA, Nazaryan V, Davis LK, Klein SB, Nichiporov D, Mendonca MS, Wolanski M, Nie X, George J, Keppel C.
    Radiat Res; 2013 Jan 15; 179(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 23148508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Monte Carlo simulations of therapeutic proton beams for relative biological effectiveness of double-strand break.
    Wang CC, Hsiao Y, Lee CC, Chao TC, Wang CC, Tung CJ.
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2012 Jan 15; 88(1-2):158-63. PubMed ID: 21823821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Involvement of the Artemis protein in the relative biological efficiency observed with the 76-MeV proton beam used at the Institut Curie Proton Therapy Center in Orsay.
    Calugaru V, Nauraye C, Cordelières FP, Biard D, De Marzi L, Hall J, Favaudon V, Mégnin-Chanet F.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Sep 01; 90(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 25195988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Relative biological effectiveness of high linear energy transfer α-particles for the induction of DNA-double-strand breaks, chromosome aberrations and reproductive cell death in SW-1573 lung tumour cells.
    Franken NA, Hovingh S, Ten Cate R, Krawczyk P, Stap J, Hoebe R, Aten J, Barendsen GW.
    Oncol Rep; 2012 Mar 01; 27(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 22200791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A mechanism-based approach to predict the relative biological effectiveness of protons and carbon ions in radiation therapy.
    Frese MC, Yu VK, Stewart RD, Carlson DJ.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 May 01; 83(1):442-50. PubMed ID: 22099045
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vivo radiobiological characterization of proton beam at the National Cancer Center in Korea: effect of the Chk2 mutation.
    Kim SS, Choo DW, Shin D, Baek HJ, Kim TH, Motoyama N, De Coster BM, Gueulette J, Furusawa Y, Ando K, Cho KH.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Feb 01; 79(2):559-62. PubMed ID: 21195877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Empirical model estimation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beam therapy.
    Chen Y, Ahmad S.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr 01; 149(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 21593038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Measurements of relative biological effectiveness of the 70 MeV proton beam at TRIUMF using Chinese hamster V79 cells and the high-precision cell sorter assay.
    Wouters BG, Lam GK, Oelfke U, Gardey K, Durand RE, Skarsgard LD.
    Radiat Res; 1996 Aug 01; 146(2):159-70. PubMed ID: 8693066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Radiobiological analysis of human melanoma cells on the 62 MeV CATANA proton beam.
    Petrović I, Ristić-Fira A, Todorović D, Valastro L, Cirrone P, Cuttone G.
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2006 Apr 01; 82(4):251-65. PubMed ID: 16690593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Relative biological effectiveness of proton medical beam at Moscow synchrotron determined by the Chinese hamster cells assay.
    Yashkin PN, Silin DI, Zolotov VA, Kostjuchenko VI, Nichiporov DF, Feoktistova TP, Martirosov KS, Minakova YI, Khoroshkov VS, Polonski PB.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Feb 01; 31(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 7852117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Relative biologic effectiveness determination in mouse intestine for scanning proton beam at Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland. Influence of motion.
    Gueulette J, Blattmann H, Pedroni E, Coray A, De Coster BM, Mahy P, Wambersie A, Goitein G.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jul 01; 62(3):838-45. PubMed ID: 15936568
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Calculation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beams using biological weighting functions.
    Paganetti H, Olko P, Kobus H, Becker R, Schmitz T, Waligorski MP, Filges D, Müller-Gärtner HW.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Feb 01; 37(3):719-29. PubMed ID: 9112472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H, Niemierko A, Ancukiewicz M, Gerweck LE, Goitein M, Loeffler JS, Suit HD.
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun 01; 53(2):407-21. PubMed ID: 12023146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The depth-dependent radiation response of human melanoma cells exposed to 65 MeV protons.
    Courdi A, Brassart N, Hérault J, Chauvel P.
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Aug 01; 67(800):800-4. PubMed ID: 8087487
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H.
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2003 Oct 01; 2(5):413-26. PubMed ID: 14529306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 30.