These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Comparison of left ventricular function assessment using phonocardiogram- and electrocardiogram-triggered 2D SSFP CINE MR imaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Becker M, Frauenrath T, Hezel F, Krombach GA, Kremer U, Koppers B, Butenweg C, Goemmel A, Utting JF, Schulz-Menger J, Niendorf T. Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1344-55. PubMed ID: 20013275 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Doppler ultrasound compared with electrocardiogram and pulse oximetry cardiac triggering: A pilot study. Kording F, Schoennagel B, Lund G, Ueberle F, Jung C, Adam G, Yamamura J. Magn Reson Med; 2015 Nov; 74(5):1257-65. PubMed ID: 25359183 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Doppler Ultrasound Triggering for Cardiovascular MRI at 3T in a Healthy Volunteer Study. Kording F, Yamamura J, Lund G, Ueberle F, Jung C, Adam G, Schoennagel BP. Magn Reson Med Sci; 2017 Apr 10; 16(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 27001390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of the trigger technique on ventricular function measurements using 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of ECG versus pulse wave triggering. Sievers B, Wiesner M, Kiria N, Speiser U, Schoen S, Strasser RH. Acta Radiol; 2011 May 01; 52(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 21498278 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]