These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Life and death choices after Cruzan: case law and standards of professional conduct. Gostin L, Weir RF. Milbank Q; 1991; 69(1):143-73. PubMed ID: 2034182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health: a clear and convincing call for comprehensive legislation to protect incompetent patients' rights. Suhr JN. Am Univ Law Rev; 1991; 40(4):1477-519. PubMed ID: 11651350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Cruzan and the constitutionalization of American life. Schneider CE. J Med Philos; 1992 Dec; 17(6):589-604. PubMed ID: 1479308 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The legal consensus about foregoing life-sustaining treatment: its status and its prospects. Meisel A. Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 1992 Dec; 2(4):309-45. PubMed ID: 10123320 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan. Weir RF, Gostin L. JAMA; 1990 Oct 10; 264(14):1846-53. PubMed ID: 2402044 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cruzan: facing the inevitable. Bopp J, Marzen TJ. Law Med Health Care; 1991 Oct 10; 19(1-2):37-51. PubMed ID: 1910130 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of families as surrogate decisionmakers after Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. Rushton CH, Hogue EE. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1991 Oct 10; 7():219-38. PubMed ID: 10111247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty. Bopp J, Avila D. Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr 10; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan. Garvey MA. J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug 10; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail. McLean ED. Emory Law J; 1991 Aug 10; 40(4):1305-41. PubMed ID: 16134267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of Cruzan and Schiavo: the burden of proof, due process, and autonomy in the persistently vegetative patient. Mareiniss DP. J Leg Med; 2005 Jun 10; 26(2):233-59. PubMed ID: 16036814 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]