These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


266 related items for PubMed ID: 21082306

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Effectiveness of a mouthrinse containing active ingredients in addition to chlorhexidine and triclosan compared with chlorhexidine and triclosan rinses on plaque, gingivitis, supragingival calculus and extrinsic staining.
    Kumar S, Patel S, Tadakamadla J, Tibdewal H, Duraiswamy P, Kulkarni S.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22672130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. The effects of three oral sprays on plaque and gingival inflammation.
    Bozkurt FY, Oztürk M, Yetkin Z.
    J Periodontol; 2005 Oct; 76(10):1654-60. PubMed ID: 16253086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Influence of additional active ingredients on the effectiveness of non-alcoholic chlorhexidine mouthwashes: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bascones A, Morante S, Mateos L, Mata M, Poblet J.
    J Periodontol; 2005 Sep; 76(9):1469-75. PubMed ID: 16171434
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. A preliminary comparison of the effect of 0.3% versus 0.2% chlorhexidine mouth rinse on de novo plaque formation: a monocentre randomized double-blind crossover trial.
    Pilloni A, Zeza B, Mongardini C, Dominici F, Cassini MA, Polimeni A.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Aug; 11(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 23320469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Effectiveness of 0.50% and 0.75% chlorhexidine dentifrices in orthodontic patients: a double-blind and randomized controlled trial.
    Oltramari-Navarro PV, Titarelli JM, Marsicano JA, Henriques JF, Janson G, Lauris JR, Buzalaf MA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Nov; 136(5):651-6. PubMed ID: 19892280
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Comparison of the effectiveness of 0.5% tea, 2% neem and 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwashes on oral health: a randomized control trial.
    Balappanavar AY, Sardana V, Singh M.
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013 Nov; 24(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 23852229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. The comparison of various oral hygiene strategies in neuromuscularly disabled individuals.
    Bozkurt FY, Fentoglu O, Yetkin Z.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov 15; 5(4):23-31. PubMed ID: 15558087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Patients' self-assessment of oral malodour and its relationship with organoleptic scores and oral conditions.
    Romano F, Pigella E, Guzzi N, Aimetti M.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2010 Feb 15; 8(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 20096081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.