These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
424 related items for PubMed ID: 21084903
1. An optimal contrast dose indicator for the determination of hepatic enhancement in abdominal multidetector computed tomography: comparison of patient attenuation indicator with total body weight and body mass index. Li J, Udayasankar UK, Tang X, Carew J, Toth TL, Small WC. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):874-8. PubMed ID: 21084903 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose. Bae KT, Shah AJ, Shang SS, Wang JH, Chang S, Kanematsu M, Hildebolt CF. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1589-94. PubMed ID: 18941106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Body size indexes for optimizing iodine dose for aortic and hepatic enhancement at multidetector CT: comparison of total body weight, lean body weight, and blood volume. Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Tomita Y, Kim MJ, Moriyama N, Onozuka M, Shiratori Y, Bae KT. Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):163-9. PubMed ID: 20019137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of body mass index and gender on coronary arterial attenuation with fixed iodine load per body weight at dual-source CT coronary angiography. Zhu X, Zhu Y, Xu H, Tang L, Xu Y. Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 22798383 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Split-bolus spectral multidetector CT of the pancreas: assessment of radiation dose and tumor conspicuity. Brook OR, Gourtsoyianni S, Brook A, Siewert B, Kent T, Raptopoulos V. Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 23674791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Moderate versus high concentration of contrast material for aortic and hepatic enhancement and tumor-to-liver contrast at multi-detector row CT. Awai K, Inoue M, Yagyu Y, Watanabe M, Sano T, Nin S, Koike R, Nishimura Y, Yamashita Y. Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):682-8. PubMed ID: 15486215 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abdominal multidetector CT in patients with varying body fat percentages: estimation of optimal contrast material dose. Kondo H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Tomita Y, Miyoshi T, Hatcho A, Moriyama N, Onozuka M, Shiratori Y, Bae KT. Radiology; 2008 Dec; 249(3):872-7. PubMed ID: 18941161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. Herts BR, Paushter DM, Einstein DM, Zepp R, Friedman RA, Obuchowski N. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pancreas: patient body weight tailored contrast material injection protocol versus fixed dose protocol at dynamic CT. Yanaga Y, Awai K, Nakayama Y, Nakaura T, Tamura Y, Hatemura M, Yamashita Y. Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 17890356 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement During Hepatic-Arterial and Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography Scanning: Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis Using Age, Sex, Total Body Weight, Height, and Cardiac Output. Masuda T, Nakaura T, Funama Y, Higaki T, Kiguchi M, Imada N, Sato T, Awai K. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2017 Nov; 41(2):309-314. PubMed ID: 27759599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of duration of contrast material injection on peak enhancement times and values of the aorta, main portal vein, and liver at dynamic MDCT with the dose of contrast medium tailored to patient weight. Erturk SM, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Tsukamoto T, Motosugi U, Araki T. Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):263-71. PubMed ID: 18275866 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Determining contrast medium dose and rate on basis of lean body weight: does this strategy improve patient-to-patient uniformity of hepatic enhancement during multi-detector row CT? Ho LM, Nelson RC, Delong DM. Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):431-7. PubMed ID: 17456869 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography. Sahani DV, Soulez G, Chen KM, Lepanto L, Xu JR, Nelson RC, Grazioli L, Vanzulli A, Heiken JP, Investigators of the IMPACT Study. Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-source CT coronary angiography involving injection protocol with iodine load tailored to patient body weight and body mass index: estimation of optimal contrast material dose. Zhu X, Zhu Y, Xu H, Yang G, Tang L, Xu Y. Acta Radiol; 2013 Mar 01; 54(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 23171529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of patient weight and scanning duration on contrast enhancement during pulmonary multidetector CT angiography. Bae KT, Tao C, Gürel S, Hong C, Zhu F, Gebke TA, Milite M, Hildebolt CF. Radiology; 2007 Feb 01; 242(2):582-9. PubMed ID: 17255426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abdominal multi-detector row CT: effectiveness of determining contrast medium dose on basis of body surface area. Onishi H, Murakami T, Kim T, Hori M, Osuga K, Tatsumi M, Higashihara H, Maeda N, Tsuboyama T, Nakamoto A, Tomoda K, Tomiyama N. Eur J Radiol; 2011 Dec 01; 80(3):643-7. PubMed ID: 20864283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast enhancement in cardiovascular MDCT: effect of body weight, height, body surface area, body mass index, and obesity. Bae KT, Seeck BA, Hildebolt CF, Tao C, Zhu F, Kanematsu M, Woodard PK. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Mar 01; 190(3):777-84. PubMed ID: 18287452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Re-evaluation of body weight as an indicator for contrast material dosage for indirect CT venography. Saito M, Koizumi J, Ichikawa T, Moriguchi H, Ikeda S, Yamashita E, Imai Y. Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2009 Apr 20; 34(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 21318992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast media in abdominal computed tomography: optimization of delivery methods. Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, Kim SJ. Korean J Radiol; 2001 Apr 20; 2(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11752966 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of enhancement, image quality, cost, and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-slice MDCT. Setty BN, Sahani DV, Ouellette-Piazzo K, Hahn PF, Shepard JA. J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2006 Apr 20; 30(5):818-22. PubMed ID: 16954936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]