These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

312 related items for PubMed ID: 21088018

  • 1. The capacity of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy to predict natural conception.
    Verhoeve HR, Coppus SF, van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Hompes PG, Bourdrez P, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F, Mol BW, Collaborative Effort on the Clinical Evaluation in Reproductive Medicine.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Jan; 26(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 21088018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J, van Welie N, Dreyer K, van Hooff MHA, de Bruin JP, Verhoeve HR, Mol F, Kleiman-Broeze KA, Traas MAF, Muijsers GJJM, Manger AP, Gianotten J, de Koning CH, Koning AMH, Bayram N, van der Ham DP, Vrouenraets FPJM, Kalafusova M, van de Laar BIG, Kaijser J, van Oostwaard MF, Meijer WJ, Broekmans FJM, Valkenburg O, van der Voet LF, van Disseldorp J, Lambers MJ, Peters HE, Lier MCI, Lambalk CB, van Wely M, Bossuyt PMM, Stoker J, van der Veen F, Mol BWJ, Mijatovic V.
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May 09; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prognostic significance of diagnostic laparoscopy for spontaneous fertility.
    Mol BW, Swart P, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F.
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Feb 09; 44(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 10853436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology?
    Lavy Y, Lev-Sagie A, Holtzer H, Revel A, Hurwitz A.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 May 10; 114(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 15099873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Screening strategies for tubal factor subfertility.
    den Hartog JE, Lardenoije CM, Severens JL, Land JA, Evers JL, Kessels AG.
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Aug 10; 23(8):1840-8. PubMed ID: 18579509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Chlamydia trachomatis IgG seropositivity is associated with lower natural conception rates in ovulatory subfertile women without visible tubal pathology.
    Coppus SF, Land JA, Opmeer BC, Steures P, Eijkemans MJ, Hompes PG, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F, Mol BW, van der Steeg JW.
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Nov 10; 26(11):3061-7. PubMed ID: 21926058
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome.
    Mol BW, Collins JA, Burrows EA, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM.
    Hum Reprod; 1999 May 10; 14(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 10325270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Infertility work-up: To what degree does laparoscopy change the management strategy based on hysterosalpingography findings?
    Berker B, Şükür YE, Aytaç R, Atabekoğlu CS, Sönmezer M, Özmen B.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Nov 10; 41(11):1785-90. PubMed ID: 26399775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Is hysterosalpingography an important tool in predicting fertility outcome?
    Mol BW, Swart P, Bossuyt PM, van der Veen F.
    Fertil Steril; 1997 Apr 10; 67(4):663-9. PubMed ID: 9093191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The significance of laparoscopy in determining the optimal management plan for infertile patients with suspected tubal pathology revealed by hysterosalpingography.
    Tsuji I, Ami K, Fujinami N, Hoshiai H.
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 2012 Jun 10; 227(2):105-8. PubMed ID: 22687706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy versus hysterosalpingography to diagnose tubal pathology in the work-up of subfertile women, a randomised clinical trial.
    Tros R, van Kessel MA, van Kuijk SMJ, Oosterhuis GJE, Kuchenbecker WKH, Kwee J, Bongers MY, Mol BWJ, Koks CAM.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 May 10; 236():127-132. PubMed ID: 30903885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Are patient characteristics associated with the accuracy of hysterosalpingography in diagnosing tubal pathology? An individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Broeze KA, Opmeer BC, Van Geloven N, Coppus SF, Collins JA, Den Hartog JE, Van der Linden PJ, Marianowski P, Ng EH, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Strandell A, Van der Veen F, Mol BW.
    Hum Reprod Update; 2011 May 10; 17(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 21147835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of time lapse for establishing distal tubal occlusion diagnosis during hysterosalpingography procedure performed by using water soluble contrast media.
    Kahyaoglu S, Yumusak OH, Kahyaoglu I, Kucukbas GN, Esercan A, Tasci Y.
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2017 May 10; 80(5):313-318. PubMed ID: 27889460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
    Strandell A, Bourne T, Bergh C, Granberg S, Asztely M, Thorburn J.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep 10; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of hysterosalpingograms with laparoscopy in the diagnostic of tubal factor of female infertility at the Yaoundé General Hospital, Cameroon.
    Ngowa JD, Kasia JM, Georges NT, Nkongo V, Sone C, Fongang E.
    Pan Afr Med J; 2015 Sep 10; 22():264. PubMed ID: 26958127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The cost-effectiveness of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy versus hysterosalpingography in the work-up for subfertility.
    van Kessel MA, Pham CT, Tros R, Oosterhuis GJE, Kuchenbecker WKH, Bongers MY, Mol BWJ, Koks CAM.
    Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov 24; 37(12):2768-2776. PubMed ID: 36223599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prognostic capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy to predict spontaneous pregnancy.
    van Tetering EA, Bongers MY, Wiegerinck MA, Mol BW, Koks CA.
    Hum Reprod; 2007 Apr 24; 22(4):1091-4. PubMed ID: 17234678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Integration of patient characteristics and the results of Chlamydia antibody testing and hysterosalpingography in the diagnosis of tubal pathology: an individual patient data meta-analysis.
    Broeze KA, Opmeer BC, Coppus SF, Van Geloven N, Den Hartog JE, Land JA, Van der Linden PJ, Ng EH, Van der Steeg JW, Steures P, Van der Veen F, Mol BW.
    Hum Reprod; 2012 Oct 24; 27(10):2979-90. PubMed ID: 22851718
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The prognostic capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy to predict non-IVF conception.
    van Kessel M, Tros R, Oosterhuis J, Kuchenbecker WH, Vernooij EM, Bongers MY, Mol BWJ, Koks CA.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2018 May 24; 36(5):552-559. PubMed ID: 29456102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Can hysterosalpingocontrast-sonography replace hysterosalpingography in the assessment of tubal subfertility?
    Dijkman AB, Mol BW, van der Veen F, Bossuyt PM, Hogerzeil HV.
    Eur J Radiol; 2000 Jul 24; 35(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 10930765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.