These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


158 related items for PubMed ID: 21088646

  • 1. Significant differences in skin irritation by common suture materials assessed by a comparative computerized objective method.
    Parara SM, Manios A, de Bree E, Tosca A, Tsiftsis DD.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Mar; 127(3):1191-1198. PubMed ID: 21088646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The skin irritation of common suture materials.
    Hwang K.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Dec; 128(6):788e. PubMed ID: 22094794
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. "Informed consent" does not inform the readers: complying with the journal's ethical standards and the declaration of Helsinki.
    Freshwater MF.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Nov; 128(5):577e-578e. PubMed ID: 22030533
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of various methods and materials for treatment of skin laceration by a 3-dimensional measuring technique in a pig experiment.
    Zeplin PH, Schmidt K, Laske M, Ziegler UE.
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 May; 58(5):566-72. PubMed ID: 17452845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Use of absorbable suture material in dermatologic surgery].
    Breuninger H, Haueisen S.
    Z Hautkr; 1985 Mar 01; 60(5):453-7. PubMed ID: 3922138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. How do absorbable sutures absorb? A prospective double-blind randomized clinical study of tissue reaction to polyglactin 910 sutures in human skin.
    Cartmill BT, Parham DM, Strike PW, Griffiths L, Parkin B.
    Orbit; 2014 Dec 01; 33(6):437-43. PubMed ID: 25244631
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of suture materials on healing skin wounds.
    Van Winkle W, Hastings JC, Barker E, Hines D, Nichols W.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jan 01; 140(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 1108243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for intradermal skin closure in cats.
    Papazoglou LG, Tsioli V, Papaioannou N, Georgiadis M, Savvas I, Prassinos N, Kouti V, Bikiaris D, Hadzigiannakis C, Zavros N.
    Can Vet J; 2010 Jul 01; 51(7):770-2. PubMed ID: 20885834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.
    Irvin TT, Koffman CG, Duthie HL.
    Br J Surg; 1976 Oct 01; 63(10):793-6. PubMed ID: 791437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Intradermal buried vertical mattress suture as sole skin closure: evaluation of 149 cases.
    Hohenleutner U, Egner N, Hohenleutner S, Landthaler M.
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2000 Oct 01; 80(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 11200831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.
    Homvises B.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug 01; 97 Suppl 8():S88-94. PubMed ID: 25518299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of suture material and suture technique on collagen fibril diameters in midline laparotomies.
    Höer J, Anurov M, Titkova S, Klinge U, Töns C, Ottinger A, Schumpelick V.
    Eur Surg Res; 2000 Aug 01; 32(6):359-67. PubMed ID: 11182620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of polydioxanone and polyglactin 910 in intradermal repair.
    Guyuron B, Vaughan C.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Oct 01; 98(5):817-20. PubMed ID: 8823020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A systematic review and meta-analysis: Do absorbable or non-absorbable suture materials differ in cosmetic outcomes in patients requiring primary closure of facial wounds?
    Gillanders SL, Anderson S, Mellon L, Heskin L.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Dec 01; 71(12):1682-1692. PubMed ID: 30268743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Use of 7/0 Vicryl (coated polyglactin 910) and 7/0 Vicryl-rapide (irradiated polyglactin 910) in skin closure in ophthalmic plastic surgery.
    Talbot AW, Meadows AE, Tyers AG, Shah-Desai S.
    Orbit; 2002 Mar 01; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12029576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of skin adhesive and absorbable intracutaneous suture for the implantation of cardiac rhythm devices.
    Spencker S, Coban N, Koch L, Schirdewan A, Mueller D.
    Europace; 2011 Mar 01; 13(3):416-20. PubMed ID: 21075757
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Performance comparison of nylon and an absorbable suture material (Polyglactin 910) in the closure of punch biopsy sites.
    Gabel EA, Jimenez GP, Eaglstein WH, Kerdel FA, Falanga V.
    Dermatol Surg; 2000 Aug 01; 26(8):750-2; discussion 752-3. PubMed ID: 10940061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Skin closure in inguinal hernia repair with rapidly absorbing Polyglactin 910/370 (Vicryl-Rapide) suture material].
    Szabó S, István G.
    Magy Seb; 2002 Apr 01; 55(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 12049012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The cuticular purse string suture: a modified purse string suture for the partial closure of round postoperative wounds.
    Cohen PR, Martinelli PT, Schulze KE, Nelson BR.
    Int J Dermatol; 2007 Jul 01; 46(7):746-53. PubMed ID: 17614809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep 12; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.