These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


295 related items for PubMed ID: 21092290

  • 1. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters.
    Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR.
    Crit Care; 2010; 14(6):R212. PubMed ID: 21092290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cross-comparisons of trending accuracies of continuous cardiac-output measurements: pulse contour analysis, bioreactance, and pulmonary-artery catheter.
    Lamia B, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR.
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Feb; 32(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 28188408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reliability of cardiac output measurements using LiDCOrapid™ and FloTrac/Vigileo™ across broad ranges of cardiac output values.
    Asamoto M, Orii R, Otsuji M, Bougaki M, Imai Y, Yamada Y.
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2017 Aug; 31(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 27300325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of accuracy of two uncalibrated pulse contour cardiac output monitors in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients using pulmonary artery catheter-thermodilution as a reference.
    Mukkamala R, Kohl BA, Mahajan A.
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2021 Jul 10; 21(1):189. PubMed ID: 34246222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of acute pulmonary hypertension on cardiac output measurements: calibrated pulse contour analysis, transpulmonary and pulmonary artery thermodilution against a modified Fick method in an animal model.
    Kutter APN, Mosing M, Hartnack S, Raszplewicz J, Renggli M, Mauch JY, Hofer CK.
    Anesth Analg; 2015 Jul 10; 121(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 25742632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of hemodynamic measurement methods during orthotopic liver transplantation: evaluating agreement and trending ability of PiCCO versus pulmonary artery catheter techniques.
    Feng Y, Ye Z, Shen Y, Xiong W, Chen X, Gan X, Wen S, Yang L.
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2024 Jun 06; 24(1):201. PubMed ID: 38844869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Evaluation of the use of the fourth version FloTrac system in cardiac output measurement before and after cardiopulmonary bypass.
    Lin SY, Chou AH, Tsai YF, Chang SW, Yang MW, Ting PC, Chen CY.
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct 06; 32(5):807-815. PubMed ID: 29039063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy and Trending Ability of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/EV1000 System in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis Before and After Surgical Valve Replacement.
    Eisenried A, Klarwein R, Ihmsen H, Wehrfritz A, Tandler R, Heim C, Fechner J.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 May 06; 33(5):1230-1236. PubMed ID: 30318421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of FloTrac cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements.
    Cannesson M, Attof Y, Rosamel P, Joseph P, Bastien O, Lehot JJ.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2007 Oct 06; 24(10):832-9. PubMed ID: 17666154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pulse contour analysis: is it able to reliably detect changes in cardiac output in the haemodynamically unstable patient?
    Critchley LA.
    Crit Care; 2011 Jan 19; 15(1):106. PubMed ID: 21349140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Improved Performance of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System for Tracking Cardiac Output Changes.
    Suehiro K, Tanaka K, Mikawa M, Uchihara Y, Matsuyama T, Matsuura T, Funao T, Yamada T, Mori T, Nishikawa K.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2015 Jan 19; 29(3):656-62. PubMed ID: 25440654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing the Mutual Interchangeability of ECOM, FloTrac/Vigileo, 3D-TEE, and ITD-PAC Cardiac Output Measuring Systems in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
    Milam AJ, Ghoddoussi F, Lucaj J, Narreddy S, Kumar N, Reddy V, Hakim J, Krishnan SH.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2021 Feb 19; 35(2):514-529. PubMed ID: 32622708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Nurse-determined assessment of cardiac output. Comparing a non-invasive cardiac output device and pulmonary artery catheter: a prospective observational study.
    Corley A, Barnett AG, Mullany D, Fraser JF.
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct 19; 46(10):1291-7. PubMed ID: 19423107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of agreement and trending ability between transpulmonary thermodilution and calibrated pulse contour and pulse power cardiac output monitoring methods against pulmonary artery thermodilution in anesthetized dogs.
    Kutter AP, Bettschart-Wolfensberger R, Romagnoli N, Bektas RN.
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2016 Jul 19; 26(4):531-40. PubMed ID: 26754858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of calibrated and uncalibrated arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitors during orthotopic liver transplantation.
    Krejci V, Vannucci A, Abbas A, Chapman W, Kangrga IM.
    Liver Transpl; 2010 Jun 19; 16(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 20517912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System in Comparison With the Intermittent Bolus Thermodilution Method in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
    Kusaka Y, Ohchi F, Minami T.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Apr 19; 33(4):953-960. PubMed ID: 30077561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Cardiac output measured by a new arterial pressure waveform analysis method without calibration compared with thermodilution after cardiac surgery.
    Breukers RM, Sepehrkhouy S, Spiegelenberg SR, Groeneveld AB.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct 19; 21(5):632-5. PubMed ID: 17905265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of thermodilution, lithium dilution, and pulse contour analysis for the measurement of cardiac output in 3 different hemodynamic states in dogs.
    Morgaz J, Granados Mdel M, Muñoz-Rascón P, Dominguez JM, Fernández-Sarmiento JA, Gómez-Villamandos RJ, Navarrete R.
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2014 Oct 19; 24(5):562-70. PubMed ID: 25142925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Minimally invasive or noninvasive cardiac output measurement: an update.
    Sangkum L, Liu GL, Yu L, Yan H, Kaye AD, Liu H.
    J Anesth; 2016 Jun 19; 30(3):461-80. PubMed ID: 26961819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.