These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Emotional event-related potentials are reduced if negative pictures presented at fixation are unattended. Wiens S, Sand A, Norberg J, Andersson P. Neurosci Lett; 2011 May 20; 495(3):178-82. PubMed ID: 21435375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Affective prime and target picture processing: an ERP analysis of early and late interference effects. Flaisch T, Stockburger J, Schupp HT. Brain Topogr; 2008 Jun 20; 20(4):183-91. PubMed ID: 18335309 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Do not neglect small troubles: moderately negative stimuli affect target processing more intensely than highly negative stimuli. Yuan J, Lu H, Yang J, Li H. Brain Res; 2011 Sep 30; 1415():84-95. PubMed ID: 21875701 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The late positive potential predicts subsequent interference with target processing. Weinberg A, Hajcak G. J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct 30; 23(10):2994-3007. PubMed ID: 21268668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The dynamic allocation of attention to emotion: simultaneous and independent evidence from the late positive potential and steady state visual evoked potentials. Hajcak G, MacNamara A, Foti D, Ferri J, Keil A. Biol Psychol; 2013 Mar 30; 92(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 22155660 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Brain dynamics in spider-phobic individuals exposed to phobia-relevant and other emotional stimuli. Michalowski JM, Melzig CA, Weike AI, Stockburger J, Schupp HT, Hamm AO. Emotion; 2009 Jun 30; 9(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 19485608 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]