These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

131 related items for PubMed ID: 21096211

  • 21. Virtual electrode effects around an artificial heterogeneity during field stimulation of cardiac tissue.
    Woods MC, Sidorov VY, Holcomb MR, Beaudoin DL, Roth BJ, Wikswo JP.
    Heart Rhythm; 2006 Jun; 3(6):751-2. PubMed ID: 16731485
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Recording evoked potentials during deep brain stimulation: development and validation of instrumentation to suppress the stimulus artefact.
    Kent AR, Grill WM.
    J Neural Eng; 2012 Jun; 9(3):036004. PubMed ID: 22510375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A closed-loop electrical stimulation system for cardiac cell cultures.
    Whittington RH, Giovangrandi L, Kovacs GT.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Jul; 52(7):1261-70. PubMed ID: 16041989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Action potential recording from dielectrophoretically positioned neurons inside micro-wells of a planar microelectrode array.
    Jaber FT, Labeed FH, Hughes MP.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Sep 15; 182(2):225-35. PubMed ID: 19540265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparisons of FIR and IIR implementations of a subtraction-based stimulus artifact rejection algorithm.
    Azin M, Chiel HJ, Mohseni P.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2007 Sep 15; 2007():1437-40. PubMed ID: 18002236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Extracellular stimulation window explained by a geometry-based model of the neuron-electrode contact.
    Buitenweg JR, Rutten WL, Marani E.
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Dec 15; 49(12 Pt 2):1591-9. PubMed ID: 12549741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Artifact characterization and removal for in vivo neural recording.
    Islam MK, Rastegarnia A, Nguyen AT, Yang Z.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Apr 15; 226():110-123. PubMed ID: 24512692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Stimulus artifact removal using a software-based two-stage peak detection algorithm.
    O'Keeffe DT, Lyons GM, Donnelly AE, Byrne CA.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2001 Aug 30; 109(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 11513948
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Review of signal distortion through metal microelectrode recording circuits and filters.
    Nelson MJ, Pouget P, Nilsen EA, Patten CD, Schall JD.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar 30; 169(1):141-57. PubMed ID: 18242715
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Closed-loop optical neural stimulation based on a 32-channel low-noise recording system with online spike sorting.
    Nguyen TK, Navratilova Z, Cabral H, Wang L, Gielen G, Battaglia FP, Bartic C.
    J Neural Eng; 2014 Aug 30; 11(4):046005. PubMed ID: 24891498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. CMOS microelectrode array for the monitoring of electrogenic cells.
    Heer F, Franks W, Blau A, Taschini S, Ziegler C, Hierlemann A, Baltes H.
    Biosens Bioelectron; 2004 Sep 15; 20(2):358-66. PubMed ID: 15308242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Toward a comparison of microelectrodes for acute and chronic recordings.
    Ward MP, Rajdev P, Ellison C, Irazoqui PP.
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul 28; 1282():183-200. PubMed ID: 19486899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. A versatile all-channel stimulator for electrode arrays, with real-time control.
    Wagenaar DA, Potter SM.
    J Neural Eng; 2004 Mar 28; 1(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15876621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Spiral wave induced numerically using electrical stimulation and comparison with experimental results.
    Xu B, Jacquir S, Laurent G, Bilbault JM, Binczak S.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010 Mar 28; 2010():2650-3. PubMed ID: 21096190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. A retrofitted neural recording system with a novel stimulation IC to monitor early neural responses from a stimulating electrode.
    Nam Y, Brown EA, Ross JD, Blum RA, Wheeler BC, DeWeerth SP.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Mar 30; 178(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 19100770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Signal-to-noise ratio improvement in multiple electrode recording.
    Musial PG, Baker SN, Gerstein GL, King EA, Keating JG.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2002 Mar 30; 115(1):29-43. PubMed ID: 11897361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Simultaneous electrical recording of cardiac electrophysiology and contraction on chip.
    Qian F, Huang C, Lin YD, Ivanovskaya AN, O'Hara TJ, Booth RH, Creek CJ, Enright HA, Soscia DA, Belle AM, Liao R, Lightstone FC, Kulp KS, Wheeler EK.
    Lab Chip; 2017 May 16; 17(10):1732-1739. PubMed ID: 28448074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Topographic prominence discriminator for the detection of short-latency spikes of retinal ganglion cells.
    Choi MH, Ahn J, Park DJ, Lee SM, Kim K, Cho DD, Senok SS, Koo KI, Goo YS.
    J Neural Eng; 2017 Feb 16; 14(1):016017. PubMed ID: 28045002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.