These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
301 related items for PubMed ID: 2110027
21. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations. Segura A, Donly KJ, Stratmann RG. Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Mutans streptococci in interproximal plaque from amalgam and glass ionomer restorations. Svanberg M, Krasse B, Ornerfeldt HO. Caries Res; 1990 Jun; 24(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 2111222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results. Yip HK, Smales RJ, Yu C, Gao XJ, Deng DM. Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. [Reinforced glass ionomer restorations in modified Class II cavities]. Valenzuela V, Stanke F. Odontol Chil; 1989 Apr; 37(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 2518367 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Class II amalgam restorations, glass-ionomer tunnel restorations, and caries development on adjacent tooth surfaces: a 3-year clinical study. Svanberg M. Caries Res; 1992 Apr; 26(4):315-8. PubMed ID: 1423449 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Mönting JS. Oper Dent; 2000 Apr; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A clinical comparison of glass ionomer (polyalkenoate) and silver amalgam restorations in the treatment of Class 5 caries in xerostomic head and neck cancer patients. Wood RE, Maxymiw WG, McComb D. Oper Dent; 1993 Sep; 18(3):94-102. PubMed ID: 8415169 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Clinical evaluation of a glass ionomer cement in primary molars. Rutar J, McAllan L, Tyas MJ. Pediatr Dent; 2000 Sep; 22(6):486-8. PubMed ID: 11132508 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements. Menezes JP, Rosenblatt A, Medeiros E. J Dent Child (Chic); 2006 Sep; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Tunnel restorations in permanent teeth. A 7 year follow up study. Hasselrot L. Swed Dent J; 1998 Sep; 22(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 9646387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Alternatives to silver amalgam and resin composite in pediatric dentistry. Croll TP. Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):697-703. PubMed ID: 10200719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, Zingg-Meyer B, Buchalla W, Mönting JS. Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11572292 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. Svanberg M, Mjör IA, Orstavik D. J Dent Res; 1990 Mar; 69(3):861-4. PubMed ID: 2109000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Secondary caries formation in vitro around fluoride-releasing restorations. Dionysopoulos P, Kotsanos N, Koliniotou-Koubia, Papagodiannis Y. Oper Dent; 1994 Mar; 19(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 8700758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Papathanasiou AG, Curzon ME, Fairpo CG. Pediatr Dent; 1994 Mar; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: a retrospective study in children. Mass E, Gordon M, Fuks AB. ASDC J Dent Child; 1999 Jun; 66(2):93-7, 84. PubMed ID: 10431617 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]