These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
395 related items for PubMed ID: 21110990
1. Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines. Toba MN, Cavanagh P, Bartolomeo P. Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jan; 49(2):238-46. PubMed ID: 21110990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Line bisection under an attentional gradient induced by simulated neglect in healthy subjects. Grewal P, Viswanathan J, Barton JJ, Lanyon LJ. Neuropsychologia; 2012 May; 50(6):1190-201. PubMed ID: 22118912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Contralesional spatial bias in chronic hemianopia: the role of (ec)centric fixation, spatial cueing and visual search. Kuhn C, Bublak P, Jobst U, Rosenthal A, Reinhart S, Kerkhoff G. Neuroscience; 2012 May 17; 210():118-27. PubMed ID: 22465437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Line bisection in left neglect: the importance of starting right. Urbanski M, Bartolomeo P. Cortex; 2008 May 17; 44(7):782-93. PubMed ID: 18489959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The centre is not in the middle: evidence from line and word bisection. Arduino LS, Previtali P, Girelli L. Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun 17; 48(7):2140-6. PubMed ID: 20385154 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Does spatial cueing affect line bisection in chronic hemianopia? Kuhn C, Rosenthal A, Bublak P, Grotemeyer KH, Reinhart S, Kerkhoff G. Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jun 17; 50(7):1656-62. PubMed ID: 22480681 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Dissecting the component deficits of perceptual imbalance in visual neglect: evidence from horizontal-vertical length comparisons. Charras P, Lupiáñez J, Migliaccio R, Toba M, Pradat-Diehl P, Duret C, Bartolomeo P. Cortex; 2012 May 17; 48(5):540-52. PubMed ID: 21371700 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pseudoneglect: evidence for both perceptual and attentional factors. Porac C, Searleman A, Karagiannakis K. Brain Cogn; 2006 Aug 17; 61(3):305-11. PubMed ID: 16527384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Causes of cross-over in unilateral neglect: between-group comparisons, within-patient dissociations and eye movements. Doricchi F, Guariglia P, Figliozzi F, Silvetti M, Bruno G, Gasparini M. Brain; 2005 Jun 17; 128(Pt 6):1386-406. PubMed ID: 15758037 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What is line bisection in unilateral spatial neglect? Analysis of perceptual and motor aspects in line bisection tasks. Ishiai S, Koyama Y, Seki K, Nakayama T. Brain Cogn; 1998 Apr 17; 36(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 9647677 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the weights of visual neglect: a new approach to dissociate defective symptoms from productive phenomena in length estimation. Charras P, Lupiáñez J, Bartolomeo P. Neuropsychologia; 2010 Sep 17; 48(11):3371-5. PubMed ID: 20621108 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Classification images of two right hemisphere patients: a window into the attentional mechanisms of spatial neglect. Shimozaki S, Kingstone A, Olk B, Stowe R, Eckstein M. Brain Res; 2006 Mar 29; 1080(1):26-52. PubMed ID: 16497281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The neural basis of vertical and horizontal line bisection judgments: an fMRI study of normal volunteers. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Weiss PH, Zilles K. Neuroimage; 2001 Jul 29; 14(1 Pt 2):S59-67. PubMed ID: 11373134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Putting attention on the line: investigating the activation-orientation hypothesis of pseudoneglect. Bultitude JH, Aimola Davies AM. Neuropsychologia; 2006 Jul 29; 44(10):1849-58. PubMed ID: 16701730 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]