These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1245 related items for PubMed ID: 21116894

  • 1. Radiological evaluation of allograft reconstruction in acetabulum with Ganz reinforcement ring in revision total hip replacement.
    Uchiyama K, Takahira N, Fukushima K, Yamamoto T, Moriya M, Itoman M.
    J Orthop Sci; 2010 Nov; 15(6):764-71. PubMed ID: 21116894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients.
    Villatte G, Erivan R, Salles G, Pereira B, Galvin M, Descamps S, Boisgard S.
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):543-548. PubMed ID: 28366746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Acetabulum reinforcement ring with allograft bone for reconstructing acetabular defects in hip revision].
    Liu W, Yang J, Pei F, Shen B, Zhou Z, Kang P.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Aug; 26(8):902-4. PubMed ID: 23012918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum.
    Makita H, Kerboull M, Inaba Y, Tezuka T, Saito T, Kerboull L.
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3502-3509. PubMed ID: 28711340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Acetabular revision for aseptic loosening in total hip arthroplasty using cementless cup and impacted morselized allograft].
    Parratte S, Argenson JN, Flecher X, Aubaniac JM.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2007 May; 93(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 17534208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty.
    Gerber A, Pisan M, Zurakowski D, Isler B.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2358-64. PubMed ID: 14668505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Trč T, Stastný E.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012 Dec; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: a minimum five-year follow-up study.
    Gibon E, Barut N, Courpied JP, Hamadouche M.
    Bone Joint J; 2018 Jun 01; 100-B(6):725-732. PubMed ID: 29855248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF, Soileau ES.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar 20; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
    Flecher X, Appy B, Parratte S, Ollivier M, Argenson JN.
    Int Orthop; 2017 May 20; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis.
    Akiyama H, Yamamoto K, Tsukanaka M, Kawanabe K, Otsuka H, So K, Goto K, Nakamura T.
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep 20; 93(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 21911530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
    Yoshino K, Tsukeoka T, Tsuneizumi Y, Lee TH, Nakamura J, Suzuki M, Ohtori S.
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov 20; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Acetabular reconstruction using bone allograft in the revision of total hip prosthesis].
    Morand F, Clarac JP, Gayet LE, Pries P.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1998 Apr 20; 84(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 9775059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reconstruction of massive uncontained acetabular defects using allograft with cage or ring reinforcement: an assessment of the graft's ability to restore bone stock and its impact on the outcome of re-revision.
    Abolghasemian M, Sadeghi Naini M, Tangsataporn S, Lee P, Backstein D, Safir O, Kuzyk P, Gross AE.
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Mar 20; 96-B(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 24589785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Bone grafts in hip prosthesis revisions].
    Krbec M, Adler J, Messner P.
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2003 Mar 20; 70(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 12807040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Reconstruction by graft and reinforcement device in severe aseptic acetabular loosening: 10 years survivorship analysis].
    Bonnomet F, Clavert P, Gicquel P, Lefèbvre Y, Kempf JF.
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr 20; 87(2):135-46. PubMed ID: 11319425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.
    García-Rey E, Madero R, García-Cimbrelo E.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec 20; 473(12):3882-91. PubMed ID: 26245166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 63.