These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

229 related items for PubMed ID: 2111833

  • 1. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Hickel R, Voss A.
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1990; 57(3):184-8. PubMed ID: 2111833
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results.
    Hung TW, Richardson AS.
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1990 Mar; 56(3):239-40. PubMed ID: 2110027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Class II glass ionomer-silver restorations in primary molars.
    Stratmann RG, Berg JH, Donly KJ.
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Jan; 20(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 2503851
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Cermet cements for milk tooth fillings. Preliminary results].
    Hickel R, Petschelt A, Voss A.
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):444-5. PubMed ID: 2517110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Occlusal glass ionomer cermet, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations: a 2-year clinical study.
    Lidums A, Wilkie R, Smales R.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):185-8. PubMed ID: 7803005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements.
    Chu CH, King NM, Lee AM, Yiu CK, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 1996 Jul; 27(7):493-501. PubMed ID: 8941827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars.
    Barr-Agholme M, Odén A, Dahllöf G, Modeér T.
    Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):230-3. PubMed ID: 1814768
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R, Lidums A, Smales R.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A, Donly KJ, Stratmann RG.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars.
    Papathanasiou AG, Curzon ME, Fairpo CG.
    Pediatr Dent; 1994 Oct; 16(4):282-8. PubMed ID: 7937261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Class II glass ionomer/silver cermet restorations and their effect on interproximal growth of mutans streptococci.
    Berg JH, Farrell JE, Brown LR.
    Pediatr Dent; 1990 Feb; 12(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2119036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.